Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 9279

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 9279, the Preventing AI Censorship Act, was introduced in the House on Jun 11, 2026 by Rep. Harriet Hageman (R). It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jun 11, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 9279 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb9279/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 9279 IH: Preventing AI Censorship Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-06-11
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9279 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 11, 2026 Ms. Hageman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To provide for a right of action against Federal employees for violations of First Amendment rights relating to the use or development of artificial intelligence.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Preventing AI Censorship Act .
2.
Right of action against Federal employees for violations of first amendment rights with respect to artificial intelligence
(a)
In general
A Federal employee who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of the United States, engages in covered conduct thereby subjecting, or causing to be subjected, any citizen of the United States to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the First Amendment, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.
(b)
Exception
This Act does not authorize a Federal employee to bring a suit against their Federal employer or the Federal Government for conduct that is within the scope of the employment relationship. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit any otherwise lawful law enforcement activity conducted pursuant to a valid warrant, court order, or other judicial authorization.
(c)
Attorney’s fees
In any action or proceeding to enforce this Act, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.
(d)
Rule of construction
Nothing in this Act may be construed to limit the ability of an injured party to seek damages, injunctive relief, or any other form of redress for the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the First Amendment, or by any other provision of the Constitution.
(e)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
The term Federal employee means an individual, other than the President or the Vice President, who occupies a position in any agency or instrumentality of the executive branch (including any independent agency).
(2)
The term artificial intelligence has the meaning as outlined in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 ( 15 U.S.C. 9401 ).
(3)
The term artificial intelligence provider means any person or entity that develops, deploys, operates, hosts, or maintains artificial intelligence, whether for compensation or without charge.
(4)
The term covered conduct means—
(A)
any action by a Federal employee to coerce, compel, direct, induce, or encourage an artificial intelligence provider to:
(i)
ban, suppress, remove, alter, or otherwise restrict content, outputs, or responses generated by artificial intelligence based on viewpoint, partisan affiliation, religious belief or practice, ideology, perceived truth or falsity, or perceived bias;
(ii)
modify the training data, model weights, fine-tuning procedures, system prompts, safety classifiers, or operational parameters of artificial intelligence for the purpose of filtering, distorting, or suppressing expression based on viewpoint, partisan affiliation, religious belief or practice, ideology, perceived truth or falsity, or perceived bias;
(iii)
deny, degrade, restrict, or alter access to artificial intelligence, or provide a materially inferior quality of service through artificial intelligence, to any person based on that person’s viewpoint, political affiliation, religious belief or practice, ideology, perceived truth or falsity, or perceived bias; or
(iv)
collect, retain, report, or disclose information about a user’s prompts, queries, or interactions with artificial intelligence to any Federal agency or employee, where such collection, retention, or disclosure is undertaken for the purpose of, or with the reasonably foreseeable effect of, surveilling, chilling, or penalizing that user’s lawful expression; or
(B)
any action by a Federal employee to directly interfere with an individual’s lawful use of artificial intelligence.
(f)
Severability
If any provision of this Act or the application of a provision of this Act to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, and the application of the provisions to any person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-06-11
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To provide for a right of action against Federal employees for violations of First Amendment rights relating to the use or development of artificial intelligence.

Sponsors

Rep. Harriet Hageman (R) sponsors H.R. 9279 alone.

Committees

H.R. 9279 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Jun 11, 2026 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 9279 has taken 2 actions since Jun 11, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jun 11, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Jun 11, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 9279 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 9279 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Preventing AI Censorship Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Preventing AI Censorship Act — Display Title
  • To provide for a right of action against Federal employees for violations of First Amendment rights relating to the use or development of artificial intelligence. — Official Title as Introduced

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 9279 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 9279’s is Law.

hr9279/policy-areas.txt
LawAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 9279, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 99 (Thursday, June 11, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Ms. HAGEMAN:H.R. 9279.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8[Page H4112]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com