Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

B 26-0702

District of Columbia CouncilIn Council Committee

Summary

B 26-0702, the First Responders Facilities Modernization Act of 2026, was introduced in the Council on Jun 5, 2026 by Sen. Brooke Pinto (D) with 4 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary and Public Safety, and last saw action on Jun 23, 2026: Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.


Record

Text

B 26-0702 has 4 co-sponsors.

b260702/introduced.txt
COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
OFFICE OF COUNCILMEMBER BROOKE PINTO
THE JOHN A. WILSON BUILDING
1350 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 106
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004
June 4, 2026
Nyasha Howard, Secretary
Council of the District of Columbia
1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
Dear Secretary Howard,
Today, I, along with Councilmembers Charles Allen, Janeese Lewis George, Anita Bonds, and
Wendell Felder, am introducing the First Responders Facilities Modernization Act of 2026. Please
find enclosed a signed copy of the legislation. Our first responders are vital to the safety and
security of all District residents and visitors and we must ensure that their facilities are in
excellent working condition.
The District’s Fire and Emergency Medical Services (Fire & EMS) and Metropolitan Police
Department (MPD) facilities are used 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year and are vital
to ensuring the public safety of all residents and visitors. In Fiscal Year 2025 alone, the Office of
Unified Communications received 2.3 million calls, requiring responses from our first responders
across the District. 1 As the Council continues to prioritize staffing our public safety agencies, it is
vital that all public safety facilities are maintained and updated in a timely and systematic manner
so that our first responders can do their jobs to the best of their abilities and know they are valued
by the District.
Virtually all of the District’s MPD stations and substations are in need of modernization. The same
goes for a majority of Fire & EMS facilities as well. Although some funding for various
modernization and renovation projects has been allocated in the capital budget each year, the need
continues to be great. Additionally, identifying which facilities to prioritize and the problems that
need to be addressed remains a persistent challenge. That is why the District must have a
comprehensive plan to modernize all public safety facilities.
This bill, modeled after the Planning Actively for Comprehensive Education (PACE) Facilities
Amendment Act of 2016, would create a fulsome plan for both Fire & EMS and MPD facilities’
modernizations, based on a number of criteria to measure need and the state of a facility.
Specifically, this bill would create an Office of Public Safety Facilities Planning (OPSFP) within
the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice (DMPSJ) responsible for the
OUC Performance Oversight Hearing (Jan. 28, 2026), available here.
development of a comprehensive 10-year master facilities plan for both Fire & EMS and MPD
facilities. When assessing need and generating the plan, the OPSFP shall include analyses and data
on the facilities condition, current and projected crime rates around the facilities, current and
projected call volume, current and projected development in surrounding neighborhoods, current
and projected number of employees expected to work out of each facility, facility portfolio analysis,
and engagement with community stakeholders.
The bill also lays out more detailed criteria which must be considered when determining the
prioritization and inclusion of projects in the Fire & EMS and MPD Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) each year so that the Council and the public have more transparency and understanding of
why certain projects are being prioritized over others and what the true needs are. The
comprehensive plan generated by the OPSFP would be transmitted to Council every five years for
approval, including all relevant data and reasoning for prioritization.
Modernization of MPD stations is important for officers and the public as these are public
buildings where crimes are reported and services are assessed. Modernization of Fire & EMS
stations is important so that firefighters can move as quickly and efficiently as possible during
calls and emergencies. These facilities function around-the-clock as they serve our communities
and must be more systematically prioritized for our first responders and the public.
Thank you,
Brooke Pinto
Councilmember, Ward 2
Chairwoman, Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety
Council of the District of Columbia
_____________________________ _____________________________
Councilmember Charles Allen Councilmember Brooke Pinto
_____________________________ _____________________________
Councilmember Anita Bonds Councilmember Janeese Lewis George
_____________________________
Councilmember Wendell Felder
A BILL
____________________________
IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
______________________
To establish a public safety facility modernization plan for all Fire and EMS and Metropolitan
Police Department facilities throughout the District of Columbia.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this
act be cited as the “First Responders Facilities Modernization Act of 2026”.
Sec. 2. First responders facilities modernization.
(a)(1) Beginning on December 15, 2026, and every 10 years thereafter, the Mayor shall
prepare and submit to the Council for its review and approval a proposed comprehensive 10-year
Master Facilities Plan (“Plan”) for Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) facilities and Fire
and Emergency Medical Services (“Fire & EMS”) facilities, which shall comply with the
requirements of this section. The Mayor’s submission shall be accompanied by a proposed
resolution to approve the Plan.
(2) The Council shall conduct at least one public hearing on the Plan before
voting to approve or disapprove the Plan.
1
(3) If the Council disapproves the Plan, it shall state its reasons for disapproval or
make recommendations in the disapproval resolution or in an accompanying legislative report. In
the case of disapproval by the Council, the Mayor shall submit a revised Plan within 180 days
after the Council’s disapproval.
(4) If the Council approves the Plan, the Plan shall take effect no later than the
first day of the succeeding fiscal year.
(5) If, subsequent to Council approval of the Plan, material changes become
necessary, the Mayor may modify the Plan; provided, that the modification shall be submitted to
the Council, with an accompanying proposed resolution, for consideration in the same manner as
specified in paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of this subsection.
(6) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, the Mayor shall prepare and
submit to the Council by December 15, 2027, a proposed comprehensive 5-year Master Facilities
Plan for the Metropolitan Police Department facilities and the Fire and Emergency Medical
Services facilities. The process for its review and approval shall be the same as provided in
paragraphs (1) through (4) of this subsection.
(b)(1) The Mayor shall establish an Office of Public Safety Facilities Planning
(“OPSFP”) within the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice responsible for
the development of the Plan, which shall function as a citywide plan for Fire & EMS and MPD
facilities.
(2) The OPSFP shall include in the Master Facilities Plan detailed, current
analyses and data on:
(A) The facilities condition assessment for each facility under the control
and jurisdiction of the MPD and Fire & EMS;
2
(B) Current and projected crime rates around MPD stations and
substations;
(C) Current and projected fire services call volume and response coverage
around fire stations;
(D) Current and projected emergency medical services call volume and
response coverage around fire stations;
(E) Current and projected developments for the surrounding neighborhood
of an MPD or Fire & EMS station;
(F) Current and projected number of employees expected to work out of
each of the stations;
(G) A detailed facility portfolio analysis that will inform any decisions
related to alternative financing options, including public/private development partnerships and
co-location opportunities;
(H) A communications and community involvement plan for each
neighborhood cluster that includes engagement of community members and key stakeholders,
including:
(i) Advisory Neighborhood Commissions;
(ii) Local Community Advisory Commissions;
(iii) The Washington, D.C. Fire Fighters Association; and
(iv) The Washington, D.C. Fraternal Order of Police.
(3) Beginning on December 15, 2027, and every year thereafter, the OPSFP shall
prepare and make publicly available an annual supplement to the Plan that includes:
3
(A) Results of the Department of General Services annual survey as set
forth in paragraph (4)(D) of this subsection;
(B) Updated information on:
(i) Call volume projections at each MPD or Fire and EMS facility;
and
(ii) Facility needs within each police district or service area
(C) Each Fire & EMS and MPD facility’s designation as one or more of
the following:
(i) In use and list its primary use;
(ii) Vacant; and
(iii) Significantly underused.
(4) The following agencies shall work with the OPSFP in the development of the
Plan and the annual supplement:
(A) The DC Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, which
shall transmit to the OPSFP its 10-year projections of facility needs;
(B) The Metropolitan Police Department, which shall transmit to the
OPSFP its 10-year projections of facility needs;
(C) The Office of Planning, which shall provide demographic and
neighborhood data support;
(D) The Department of General Services, which shall:
(i) Implement the Plan consistent with the policy priorities set forth
in this act; and
4
(ii) In collaboration with the Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and
Justice, Fire & EMS, and MPD, conduct an annual survey, which shall be disaggregated by
facility, made publicly available, and transmitted to OPSFP, to update information on the
condition of each Fire & EMS and MPD facility, including whether each facility has a working
carbon monoxide detector, the results of the most recent water tests at each facility for sources of
lead, and potential asbestos hazards at each facility.
(5) Of the Fiscal Year 2027 capital funds appropriated to the OPSFP, it shall
transfer:
(A) Up to $4.5 million to the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Public
Safety and Justice to support capital planning; and
(B) An amount of $100,000 to the Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department and $100,000 to the Metropolitan Police Department to support capital planning
activities.
(6) In developing the Plan, the Mayor shall consider the facilities needs of all 8
wards and shall consult with:
(A) The Council;
(B) The Washington, D.C. Fire Fighters Association; and
(C) The DC Fraternal Order of Police
(c)(1) Beginning in Fiscal Year 2027, a Fire & EMS capital improvement plan (“Fire &
EMS Facility CIP”) and an MPD capital improvement plan (“MPD Facility CIP”) shall be
updated each fiscal year as part of the Mayor’s capital improvement plan for all public facilities,
as required by section 444 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24,
1973 (87 Stat. 800; D.C. Official Code § 1-204.44).
5
(2) The Fire & EMS Facility CIP and the MPD Facility CIP shall include:
(A) A description of guiding principles to frame decisions within the Fire
& EMS Facility CIP and the MPD Facility CIP, that these guiding principles shall be revisited
with each new CIP to ensure that they are consistent with the strategic plan, the Master Facilities
Plan, and the needs of the community;
(B) A description of the process and timeline used to develop the Fire &
EMS Facility CIP and the MPD Facility CIP, including community engagement;
(C) A longitudinal and future analysis of call volume to each Fire & EMS
facility and MPD facility;
(D) Facility-specific project recommendations on the timing and funding
for modernization of existing Fire & EMS and MPD facilities, new Fire & EMS and MPD
facility construction, and other Fire & EMS and MPD facility capital improvements planned for
the next fiscal year and the succeeding 5 fiscal years; and
(E) For each project identified pursuant to subparagraph (D) of this
paragraph:
(i) A description of the scope of work to be done, schedule of
achieved and projected major milestones, and an explanation for any delay in meeting projected
milestones;
(ii) A justification for the modernization, new construction, or
other capital improvements supported by the facility condition assessment, demand, and
community needs.
(iii) A full-funded cost estimate of improvements, except that for
projects slated for modernization, new construction, or other capital improvements in years 4
6
through 6 of the Fire & EMS Facility CIP and MPD Facility CIP, the Fire & EMS Facility CIP
and MPD Facility CIP may include rough order of magnitude estimates of improvements based
on the required general design and feasibility analysis completed pursuant to paragraph (4)(C) of
this subsection;
(iv) A cost estimate of improvements planned for the next fiscal
year and the succeeding 5 fiscal years and a detailed explanation for any proposed increases over
10% from the prior-year Fire & EMS or MPD Facility CIP estimate;
(v) The estimated cost of annual maintenance and operations of the
improved facility;
(vi) The lifetime expenditure for the facility; and
(vii) The name, address, and ward of each facility.
(3)(A) Major construction and capital improvements for existing facilities shall be
prioritized for inclusion in the Fire & EMS Facility CIP and MPD Facility CIP based on certain
objective criteria contained in this paragraph.
(B) By September 30, 2027, and every 5 years thereafter, Fire and EMS
and MPD shall calculate a final prioritization score for each Fire & EMS and MPD facility in its
portfolio by assigning each facility a score from one to 10 based on the normal distribution of the
raw data obtained for every facility in each of the following subcategories, multiplying that score
by the subcategory weight as follows, and summing the weight as follows, and summing the
weighted subcategory scores for each facility:
Category Category Total Subcategory Subcategory Weight
7
Facility Condition 0.60 Date and type of last major 0.20
construction through the
preceding fiscal year
Expenditures for major 0.15
construction projects for the
preceding 10 fiscal years per
square feet of the Fire & EMS
or MPD facility
Fire & EMS and MPD facility 0.20
condition score based on the
most recent assessment
completed by the Department
of General Services
Demand 0.20 Assessment of call volume and 0.20
response performance to each
facility over the past 5 calendar
years.
Community Need 0.20 Number of residents and non- 0.15
residents currently served by
this facility.
Projected growth in the 0.10
number of people served by
this facility, including
8
commercial, residential, and
office space.
(C) By September 30, 2027, and every 5 years thereafter, Fire & EMS and
MPD shall transmit to the Council all of the prioritization scores and raw data, and shall make
the information publicly available online.
(D) In addition to the prioritization score based on criteria outlined in
subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, Fire & EMS and MPD shall consider the following factors
when determining the prioritization and inclusion of projects in the Fire & EMS Facility CIP and
the MPD Facility CIP:
(i) Availability of capital funding in the budget;
(ii) Immediate life and safety concerns;
(ii) Need for additional planning for a project;
(v) Projected needs based on the Comprehensive Plan; and
(vi) Projected needs based on population growth and development.
(E) Within 180 days after the release of the prioritization data pursuant to
subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, Fire & EMS and MPD shall conduct at least 3 public
meeting to discuss facility modernizations. Fire & EMS and MPD shall conduct explicitly
outreach with the community for each facility project likely to be added, removed, or extensively
modified in the next fiscal year’s 6-year Facility CIP.
(4) Before adding a facility to a Fire & EMS Facility CIP or an MPD Facility CIP,
the project shall have the following completed:
9
(A) A rough order of magnitude estimate, except that for projects slated
for modernization, new construction, or other capital improvements in years one through 3 of the
respective Facility CIP, the project shall have a full-funded cost estimate of improvements; and
(B) A general design and feasibility analysis that is developed with Fire
and EMS and MPD administration and is made publicly available, which includes the following:
(i) An analysis of public safety needs as they relate to the current
or projected facility;
(ii) An evaluation of whether the existing building and site
conditions can accommodate the needs; and
(iii) An evaluation of whether a swing space on-site or off-site will
be needed.
(d)(1) Within 30 days after the release of the annual supplement to the Plan as required
by subsection (b)(2)(A) of this section, the District shall:
(A) Determine which facilities will be designated as excess; and
(B) Made a list of these properties, and those deemed excess pursuant to
paragraph (2) of this subsection, publicly available on its website.
(2) Unless written justification is made publicly available at the time of the
publication of the list as required in paragraph (1) of this subsection based on projected
operational needs of Fire & EMS or MPD, a facility shall be automatically deemed excess if it
has been designated in the annual supplement to the Plan as:
(A) Vacant; or
(B) Significantly underused for 2 consecutive years.
Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement.
10
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal
impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative Procedures Act of 1975,
approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat. 2038; D.C. Official Code § 1-301.47a).
Sec. 4. Effective date.
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of a veto by
the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto) and a 30-day period of congressional
review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved
December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)).
11

As introduced, Bill 26-702 would establish a public safety facility modernization plan for all Fire and EMS and Metropolitan Police Department facilities throughout the District of Columbia.

Sponsors

Sen. Brooke Pinto (D) sponsors B 26-0702, and 4 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

B 26-0702 went before 1 committee: Judiciary and Public Safety.

Judiciary and Public Safety
Judiciary and Public Safety
Referred to · Jun 23, 2026 · 28 Bills

History

B 26-0702 has taken 3 actions since Jun 5, 2026, the latest on Jun 23, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jun 23, 2026
Council
Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
Jun 19, 2026
Council
Notice of Intent to Act on B26-0702 Published in the DC Register
Jun 5, 2026
Council
Introduced in Office of the Secretary

Votes

B 26-0702 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: lims.dccouncil.gov · legiscan.com