Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 4894

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 4894, the FUSE Act, was introduced in the Senate on Jun 24, 2026 by Sen. Ted Cruz (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Armed Services, and last saw action on Jun 24, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.


Record

Text

S. 4894 has 1 co-sponsor.

sb4894/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S4894 IS: Feedstocks. Uniformity, Safety, and Energetics Act
U.S. Senate
2026-06-24
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4894 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 24, 2026 Mr. Cruz (for himself and Mr. Kaine ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILL
To establish a pilot program on safety and qualification of printable energetic feedstocks for additive manufacturing.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Feedstocks. Uniformity, Safety, and Energetics Act or the FUSE Act .
2.
Pilot program on safety and qualification of printable energetic feedstocks for additive manufacturing
(a)
Establishment
The Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program, to be carried out by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, in coordination with the Capability Program Executive, Ammunition and Energetics (or successor organization) and appropriate service acquisition executives, to evaluate the safety, quality, and qualification pathways of printable energetic feedstocks for controlled additive manufacturing applications.
(b)
Purpose
The purposes of the pilot program are—
(1)
to determine whether the use of printable energetic feedstocks can improve handling safety, process stability, lot-to-lot consistency, and supply chain resilience relative to traditional energetics manufacturing and handling methods;
(2)
to analyze logistics impact on throughput, waste, defect rate, and constituent material availability versus state-of-the-art legacy processes;
(3)
to develop and validate new test and evaluation methods, if necessary, including metrology and digital quality assurance, suitable for assessing printable energetic feedstocks for Department of Defense use;
(4)
to assess applicability of printable energetic feedstocks to existing or planned munition and energetics modernization efforts, consistent with explosive safety, security, and environmental requirements, that provide an advantage in performance or logistics; and
(5)
to identify barriers to adoption, including infrastructure, standards, certification, and workforce requirements.
(c)
Activities
Activities under the pilot program may include—
(1)
identification, assessment, and characterization of representative printable energetic feedstocks and their performance consistency under controlled conditions;
(2)
development of qualification criteria and data packages to inform safety releases, waivers, or certifications as appropriate;
(3)
limited demonstrations at Government facilities or contractor facilities that meet all applicable explosive safety and security requirements;
(4)
development of nonproprietary standards, metrology approaches, and digital thread quality controls for printable energetic feedstocks; and
(5)
analysis of operational impacts via wargaming or mission/campaign modeling and experimental performance data.
(d)
Comparative safety assessment required
As a core element of the pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comparative assessment of the safety of the use of printable energetic feedstocks relative to traditional energetics manufacturing and handling, including, at a minimum—
(1)
hazards and risks associated with storage, transport, handling, and processing;
(2)
sensitivity and response to credible stimuli (including thermal and mechanical stimuli) using appropriate test standards;
(3)
process safety considerations, including potential failure modes and mitigations for controlled additive manufacturing workflows;
(4)
accident and incident risk modeling (including qualitative and quantitative risk assessment where feasible); and
(5)
recommended safety controls, facility requirements, and operational constraints for any future operational use.
(e)
Safety and security requirements
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that activities under the pilot program—
(1)
are conducted only at facilities compliant with applicable explosive safety siting, storage, handling, and operating requirements;
(2)
incorporate counter-diversion safeguards, inventory accountability, and chain-of-custody controls;
(3)
apply cybersecurity and access controls for any digital manufacturing files, process parameters, and quality records; and
(4)
do not authorize dissemination of restricted manufacturing parameters outside approved Government and cleared-industry channels.
(f)
Reporting
Not later than 180 days after initiation of the pilot program, and annually thereafter for the duration of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees (as that term is defined in section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code) a report that includes—
(1)
pilot objectives, participants, test locations, and safety governance structure;
(2)
test methodologies, standards used, and key safety and quality metrics;
(3)
results of activities conducted under subsection (c), including identification, assessment, and characterization of representative printable energetic feedstocks, demonstrations, qualification criteria, data packages, and standard development;
(4)
results of the comparative safety assessment required under subsection (d), including identified hazards, mitigations, and residual risk;
(5)
an assessment of cost, schedule, and scalability relative to traditional energetics manufacturing and handling;
(6)
recommended qualification and certification pathways, including any standards gaps; and
(7)
any recommended legislative, regulatory, or resourcing actions required to enable safe adoption.
(g)
Duration
The pilot program shall be carried out for not more than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this section.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-06-24
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to establish a pilot program on safety and qualification of printable energetic feedstocks for additive manufacturing.

Sponsors

Sen. Ted Cruz (R) sponsors S. 4894, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 4894 went before 1 committee: Armed Services.

Armed Services
Armed Services
Referred To · Jun 24, 2026

Actions

S. 4894 has taken 2 actions since Jun 24, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jun 24, 2026
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.Armed Services Committee
Jun 24, 2026
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 4894 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to S. 4894.

Titles

S. 4894 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • FUSE Act — Display Title
  • FUSE Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Feedstocks. Uniformity, Safety, and Energetics Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to establish a pilot program on safety and qualification of printable energetic feedstocks for additive manufacturing. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 4 registered lobbyists who named S. 4894 in 1 quarterly filing, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Defense, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Torts.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FKA U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-INSTITUTE FOR LEGAL REFORMDistrict of Columbia11$50K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
TIBER CREEK GROUP11$50K

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
DANIEL ZAWITOSKI111
JENNIFER OLSON111
JOHN GONZALEZ111
TIMOTHY MOLINO111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FKA U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-INSTITUTE FOR LEGAL REFORMTIBER CREEK GROUP2026 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 4894 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 4894’s is Armed Forces and National Security.

s4894/policy-areas.txt
Armed Forces and National SecurityAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com