H.Res. 1469

119 HRES 1469 IH: Condemning a legal opinion issued by the U.S. Department of Justice on June 18, 2026, regarding the Olmstead v. L.C., the 1999 Supreme Court decision that recognized institutional isolation of people with disabilities as discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2026-08-03
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 IV  119th CONGRESS  2d Session  H. RES. 1469  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES   August 3, 2026   Mrs. Dingell  (for herself and  Ms. Scanlon ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the  Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committees on  Energy and Commerce , and  Education and Workforce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned   RESOLUTION
Condemning a legal opinion issued by the U.S. Department of Justice on June 18, 2026, regarding the Olmstead v. L.C., the 1999 Supreme Court decision that recognized institutional isolation of people with disabilities as discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Whereas section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( 29 U.S.C. 794 ) (referred to in this resolution as  section 504 ) prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all federally assisted programs or activities and laid the foundation for the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. ) (referred to in this resolution as  the ADA );
Whereas in 1977, the former Department of Health, Education, and Welfare issued implementing regulations for section 504 requiring recipients of Federal funds to provide services and programs in a manner that affords people with disabilities an  equal opportunity to obtain the same results, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s  needs (sections 84.4(b)(1)(iii) and 84.4(b)(2) of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on the date of issuance);
Whereas in 1978, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare issued a similar rule requiring recipients of funds from the Department to  administer programs and activities in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified  persons with disabilities (43 Fed. Reg. 2132);
Whereas in 1978, Congress amended section 504 to strengthen and clarify its nondiscrimination requirements, thereby ratifying the 1977 and 1978 regulations and incorporating the regulations into the Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
Whereas in the ADA, Congress found that the isolation and segregation of individuals with disabilities is a serious and pervasive form of discrimination;
Whereas through passage of the ADA, Congress intended that forms of discrimination prohibited under section 504 and its implementing regulations, including unnecessary segregation, be prohibited under the ADA as well;
Whereas on June 22, 1999, the Supreme Court in Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999) (referred to in this resolution as  the Olmstead decision ), held that under the ADA, States must offer qualified individuals with disabilities the choice to receive their long-term services and support in a community-based setting;
Whereas the Supreme Court recognized in the Olmstead decision that  institutional placement of persons who can handle and benefit from community settings perpetuates unwarranted assumptions that persons so isolated are incapable or unworthy of participating in community life ;
Whereas the Supreme Court further recognized that  confinement in an institution severely diminishes the everyday life activities of individuals, including activities involving family relations and social contacts, work options, economic independence, educational advancement, and cultural enrichment. ;
Whereas the Olmstead decision and the integration mandate of the ADA and section 504 have repeatedly been affirmed by courts across the United States, by Congress, and in Federal regulations and guidance, prohibiting States from forcing people with disabilities into segregated settings, such as psychiatric hospitals, nursing homes, segregated schools, and sheltered workshops, when those people could be served in their homes and communities;
Whereas as a result of the integration mandate, many individuals with disabilities have been able to live in their own homes and community-based settings, rather than institutional settings, and to become productive members of the community, particularly through access to home- and community-based services through the Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq. ) (referred to in this resolution as  the Medicaid program );
Whereas despite 5 decades of legal requirements, many individuals with disabilities continue to live in segregated institutional settings, where they face abuse and neglect and limitations on their individual freedoms, including solitary confinement;
Whereas on June 18, 2026, 4 days before the 27th anniversary of the Olmstead decision, the Department of Justice issued a deeply flawed opinion that rejects the integration mandate and threatens the hard-won progress towards full integration of individuals with disabilities into society in the United States;
Whereas the Department of Justice’s opinion does not overrule decades-old integration and nondiscrimination requirements under section 504, the ADA, or the Olmstead decision;
Whereas the Department of Justice admits in its own opinion that its interpretation of the Olmstead decision is  out of step with common understanding of that decision within Federal courts ; and
Whereas on July 20, 2026, the Department of Justice issued a notice stating that guidance on enforcing Olmstead and the integration mandate, which they relied upon for the past 15 years, was not enforceable, and that the Department of Justice would no longer rely upon it in its enforcement of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act; the notice also stated that the Department of Justice plans to revisit the guidance.: Now, therefore, be it
That the House of Representatives—
(1)
condemns—
(A)
the Department of Justice’s incorrect and arbitrary interpretation of the Olmstead decision and its misperceptions about what Congress intended; and
(B)
the recent cuts, and any future cuts, to the Medicaid program, including the establishment of burdensome work-reporting requirements and other barriers, which puts the health of individuals with disabilities at risk and hinders the progress made since the enactment of section 504 and the ADA;
(2)
calls on—
(A)
the Department of Justice to immediately rescind its opinion that was issued on June 18, 2026, concerning the integration mandate of title II of the ADA and section 504; and
(B)
Congress to work in a bipartisan manner to reverse the biggest cut to Medicaid in history and increase funding for home- and community-based services;
(3)
salutes all people whose efforts have contributed to the expansion of home- and community-based long-term services and supports for individuals with disabilities; and
(4)
affirms the Olmstead decision’s vital importance to ending the unjustified institutionalization and segregation of individuals with disabilities.