Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 201

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 201, the Federal Employee Performance and Accountability Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Jan 3, 2025 by Rep. Claudia Tenney (R). It was referred to Oversight And Government Reform, and last saw action on Jan 3, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.


Record

Text

H.R. 201 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb201/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 201 IH: Federal Employee Performance and Accountability Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-01-03
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 201 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2025 Ms. Tenney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform A BILL
To implement a 5-year pilot program establishing a performance-based pay structure for certain Federal employees in order to enhance productivity, accountability, and employee satisfaction in public service.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Federal Employee Performance and Accountability Act of 2025 .
2.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Director
The term Director means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
(2)
Eligible employee
The term eligible employee means an employee of an Executive agency employed in a position that—
(A)
is—
(i)
at the GS–11, GS–12, GS–13, GS–14, or GS–15 level; or
(ii)
a senior-level position, which shall be defined as a position classified above the GS–15 level under section 5108 of title 5, United States Code; and
(B)
has clearly measurable performance criteria, such as—
(i)
a project management position;
(ii)
a position involving administrative or policy analysis;
(iii)
an information technology, finance, or procurement specialist;
(iv)
a leadership position that involves managing a team, evaluating program performance, or supervising operations;
(v)
a customer service representative; or
(vi)
a claims processor.
(3)
Executive agency
The term Executive agency has the meaning given the term in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.
(4)
Participating agency
The term participating agency means an Executive agency, 1 or more employees of which are participating employees in accordance with section 3(b)(1).
(5)
Participating employee
The term participating employee means an eligible employee who participates in the Program.
(6)
Performance metrics
The term performance metrics , with respect to a participating agency, means standards for participating employees tailored to functions that are specific to the participating agency, which may include—
(A)
productivity standards, which measure quantifiable outputs such as completed cases, projects, or responses per quarter;
(B)
quality standards, which measure compliance with protocols, accuracy, and customer satisfaction rates; and
(C)
timeliness standards, which measure compliance with processing deadlines, efficiency improvements, and timely task completion.
(7)
Program
The term Program means the pilot program established under section 3(a).
3.
Pilot program eligibility and program scope
(a)
In general
During the 5-year period beginning on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall carry out a pilot program that establishes a performance-based pay structure for participating employees.
(b)
Participation
(1)
In general
Subject to paragraph (2), the head of each Executive agency shall ensure that not less than 1 percent and not more than 10 percent of eligible employees of the Executive agency participate in the Program.
(2)
Opt-out
(A)
In general
The head of an Executive agency may elect to not have the Executive agency participate in the Program if the head of the Executive agency determines that participation could pose risks to national security or public safety.
(B)
Transparency requirement
If the head of an Executive agency determines that the Executive agency should not participate in the Program pursuant to subparagraph (A), the head of the Executive agency shall submit to the Director a written justification for the decision.
4.
Performance measurement and accountability
(a)
Annual performance metrics
A participating agency shall establish annual performance metrics for each participating employee related to core functions and public service delivery, focusing on productivity, quality, and timeliness.
(b)
Evaluation process
The Director shall establish, and each participating agency shall implement, a standardized, objective performance evaluation system that includes periodic review of the performance of a participating employee.
(c)
Employee support and training
A participating agency shall provide training and resources to support participating employees in understanding and meeting performance metrics, including an introductory training course and quarterly performance feedback sessions.
5.
Incentive pay structure and non-monetary benefits
(a)
Tiered salary increase structure
(1)
In general
A participating agency shall implement a tiered salary adjustment system for participating employees based on their annual performance evaluations under section 4 under which, effective as of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after the first day of the second year of the Program, and of each year thereafter, a participating agency shall adjust (if applicable) the rate of basic pay of a participating employee in accordance with this subsection.
(2)
Tier 1 (exceeds expectations)
In the case of a participating employee who significantly exceeded established performance metrics during the preceding year (referred to in this section as a tier 1 employee ), a participating agency shall increase the rate of basic pay of the participating employee by not more than 10 percent.
(3)
Tier 2 (meets expectations)
In the case of a participating employee who met established performance metrics during the preceding year (referred to in this section as a tier 2 employee ), a participating agency may not adjust the rate of basic pay of the participating employee.
(4)
Tier 3 (below expectations)
In the case of a participating employee who did not meet established performance metrics during the preceding year (referred to in this section as a tier 3 employee ), the participating agency shall—
(A)
reduce the rate of basic pay of the participating employee by 10 percent; and
(B)
provide training or development opportunities to assist the participating employee in improving performance.
(b)
Bonuses
The head of a participating agency, at the discretion of the agency head, may award a bonus to a tier 1 employee.
(c)
Non-Monetary benefits
The head of a participating agency, at the discretion of the agency head, may provide a tier 1 employee or tier 2 employee with flexible scheduling, telework options, and other non-monetary benefits or incentives, such as technology upgrades and parking options.
(d)
Relation to title 5 pay adjustments, step-Increases, and other monetary benefits
A participating employee shall not be eligible for any adjustment of pay, advancement in pay, or bonus or other type of additional monetary compensation under title 5, United States Code, based on any service performed while the employee is participating in the Program, including—
(1)
adjustment of the rate of basic pay under section 5303, 5304, or 5304a of that title;
(2)
advancement in pay to a higher rate within the grade in which the employee's position is placed under section 5335 or 5336 of that title;
(3)
bonuses under section 5753 or 5754 of that title; and
(4)
performance awards under section 5384 of that title.
6.
Reporting and accountability
(a)
Annual agency productivity reports
(1)
In general
For each year in which the Program is carried out, a participating agency shall submit a report to the Director that includes the following information:
(A)
Quantitative outcomes
Data on cost savings, efficiency gains, and overall productivity metrics.
(B)
Qualitative outcomes
Examples of how productivity improvements have positively impacted public service outcomes and employee satisfaction.
(2)
OMB oversight and recommendations
The Director shall—
(A)
review each report submitted under paragraph (1); and
(B)
recommend adjustments to participating agencies as appropriate.
(b)
Annual OMB assessments
For each year in which the Program is carried out, the Director shall—
(1)
assess the outcomes of the Program with respect to productivity, budgetary impact, and employee satisfaction; and
(2)
publish and submit to Congress a report on the assessment conducted under paragraph (1).
(c)
Final review
Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Program terminates, the Comptroller General of the United States and the Director shall assess the success of the Program and submit to Congress a report on the impact of the Program on productivity, budgets, and employee engagement.
7.
Funding
(a)
No additional funds
No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act.
(b)
Use of existing funds
The Office of Management and Budget, the Government Accountability Office, and each participating agency shall carry out the duties of the respective agency under this Act using amounts otherwise made available to that agency.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-01-03
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Jan 3, 2025

hb201/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/2025)

Sponsors

Rep. Claudia Tenney (R) sponsors H.R. 201 alone.

Committees

H.R. 201 went before 1 committee: Oversight and Government Reform.

Oversight and Government Reform
Oversight and Government Reform
Referred To · Jan 3, 2025 · 696 Bills

Actions

H.R. 201 has taken 2 actions since Jan 3, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jan 3, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jan 3, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Votes

H.R. 201 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 201.

Titles

H.R. 201 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Federal Employee Performance and Accountability Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Federal Employee Performance and Accountability Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To implement a 5-year pilot program establishing a performance-based pay structure for certain Federal employees in order to enhance productivity, accountability, and employee satisfaction in public service. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 9 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 201 in 6 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Government Issues, Health Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONDistrict of Columbia16

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION16

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2025 fourth_quarter$350K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2025 second_quarter$350K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2026 second_quarter$340K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2026 first_quarter$310K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2025 third_quarter$300K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2025 first_quarter$300K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 201 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 6 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 201’s is Government Operations and Politics.

hr201/policy-areas.txt
Government Operations and PoliticsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 201 carries 6 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Congressional oversight to Wages and earnings.

hr201/subjects.txt
Congressional oversightEmployment and training programsGovernment employee pay, benefits, personnel managementGovernment information and archivesPerformance measurementWages and earnings

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com