- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 376
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 376, the Historic Roadways Protection Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 14, 2025 by Rep. Mike Kennedy (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Natural Resources, and last saw action on Jan 14, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Record
Text
H.R. 376 has 3 co-sponsors.
hb376/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 376 IH: Historic Roadways Protection ActU.S. House of Representatives2025-01-14text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 376 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 14, 2025 Mr. Kennedy of Utah (for himself, Mr. Owens , Mr. Moore of Utah , and Ms. Maloy ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILLTo prohibit the use of funds by the Secretary of the Interior to finalize and implement certain travel management plans in the State of Utah.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Historic Roadways Protection Act .2.Prohibition on use of use of funds to finalize and implement certain travel management plans in the State of Utah(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Applicable periodThe term applicable period means the period that begins on the date of enactment of this Act and ends on the date on which the Secretary certifies to Congress that each of the R.S. 2477 cases has been adjudicated.(2)Covered travel management areaThe term covered travel management area means any of the following travel management areas in the State of Utah:(A)The Henry Mountains and Fremont Gorge Travel Management Area.(B)The Dinosaur (North) Travel Management Area.(C)The Book Cliffs Travel Management Area (Vernal Field Office).(D)The Nine Mile Canyon Travel Management Area (Vernal Field Office).(E)The San Rafael Swell Travel Management Area.(F)The Nine Mile Canyon Travel Management Area (Price Field Office).(G)The Book Cliffs Travel Management Area (Moab Field Office).(H)The Dolores River Travel Management Area.(I)The Trail Canyon Travel Management Area.(J)The Paunsaugunt Travel Management Area.(3)R.S. 2477 caseThe term R.S. 2477 case means each of—(A)Beaver County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–423–CW);(B)Box Elder County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 1:12–cv–105–DB);(C)Carbon County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–427–DB);(D)Daggett County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–447–RJS);(E)Duchesne County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–425–CW);(F)Emery County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–429–CW);(G)Garfield County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–478–TC);(H)Grand County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–466–DN);(I)Iron County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–472–BSJ);(J)Juab County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–462–DB);(K)Kane County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–1073–CW) (consolidated with Case No. 2:11–cv–1031–CW; Case No. 2:12–cv–476–CW);(L)Millard County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–451–DB);(M)Piute County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–428–CW);(N)Rich County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–424–DN);(O)San Juan County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–467–DAK);(P)Sanpete County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–430–DB);(Q)Sevier County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–452–DN);(R)Tooele County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–477–CW);(S)Uintah County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–461–DAK);(T)Utah County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–426–CW);(U)Washington County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–471–RJS); and(V)Wayne County and State of Utah v. United States (Case No. 2:12–cv–434–DN).(4)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management.(b)Prohibition on use of funds by the Secretary of the Interior To finalize and implement certain travel management plansDuring the applicable period, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may not obligate or expend Federal funds—(1)to finalize or implement, with respect to land within the boundary of the State of Utah, a new travel management plan for a covered travel management area; or(2)to implement, with respect to land within the boundary of the State of Utah—(A)the Indian Creek (Canyon Rims) Travel Management Plan;(B)the San Rafael Desert Travel Management Plan;(C)the San Rafael Swell Travel Management Plan; or(D)the Labyrinth/Gemini Bridges Travel Management Plan.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-01-14
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Jan 14, 2025
hb376/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (01/14/2025)
Historic Roadways Protection Act
This bill prohibits the Bureau for Land Management (BLM) from closing historical roads on public lands in certain areas of Utah until the Federal District Court for Utah makes a decision on each of the R.S. 2477 cases, which are cases brought by Utah and counties to keep historical roads on BLM land in Utah open for public use.
By way of background, a provision of the Mining Law of 1866, commonly known as R.S. 2477, granted rights-of-way to states and counties across public lands for the construction of roads for public use in order to promote settlement of the American West. In 1976, Congress repealed R.S. 2477 when it enacted the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), but FLPMA preserved rights-of-way that had been established under R.S. 2477. After the BLM released travel management plans that closed some historical roads, Utah and 22 counties filed lawsuits about their rights-of-way across public lands for historical roads.
Until the BLM certifies that those cases have been decided, the bill prohibits the BLM from obligating or expending federal funds to (1) finalize or implement a new travel management plan for certain travel management areas in Utah; or (2) implement, with respect to land within the boundary of Utah, the Indian Creek (Canyon Rims) Travel Management Plan, the San Rafael Desert Travel Management Plan, the San Rafael Swell Travel Management Plan, or the Labyrinth/Gemini Bridges Travel Management Plan.
Sponsors
Rep. Mike Kennedy (R) sponsors H.R. 376, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.R. 376 went before 1 committee: Natural Resources.
Actions
H.R. 376 has taken 2 actions since Jan 14, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 14, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Jan 14, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.Natural Resources Committee |
Votes
H.R. 376 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 376, as Identical bill.
Titles
H.R. 376 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Historic Roadways Protection Act — Display Title
- To prohibit the use of funds by the Secretary of the Interior to finalize and implement certain travel management plans in the State of Utah. — Official Title as Introduced
- Historic Roadways Protection Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 9 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 376 in 3 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Automotive Industry, Environment/Superfund, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Real Estate/Land Use/Conservation, Small Business, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Animals, Budget/Appropriations.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT MARKET ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT MARKET ASSOCIATION | 1 | 2 | — |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERIC SNYDER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JUAN MEJIA | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| KAREN BAILEY-CHAPMAN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CASSIE FERRI | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CHRISTOPHER WESTFALL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DANIEL MOSS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MARY BEETHAM | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MICHAEL LEAHY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TAYLOR RUSH | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT MARKET ASSOCIATION | SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT MARKET ASSOCIATION | 2025 first_quarter | $360K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT MARKET ASSOCIATION | SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT MARKET ASSOCIATION | 2025 second_quarter | $350K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | 2026 second_quarter | $270K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 376 under Public Lands and Natural Resources, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 3 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 376’s is Public Lands and Natural Resources.
hr376/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 376 carries 3 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Land use and conservation to Utah.
hr376/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 376, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. KENNEDY of Utah:H.R. 376.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1 Section 8[Page H149]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com
