- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 841
U.S. Senate•Senate Floor Calendar
Summary
S. 841, the Romance Scam Prevention Act, was introduced in the Senate on Mar 4, 2025 by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Sep 2, 2025: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 145.
Record
Text
S. 841 has 3 co-sponsors.
sb841/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S841 IS: Romance Scam Prevention ActU.S. Senate2025-03-04text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 841 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 4, 2025 Mrs. Blackburn (for herself and Mr. Hickenlooper ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation A BILLTo require online dating service providers to provide fraud ban notifications to online dating service members, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Romance Scam Prevention Act .2.Online dating safety(a)Fraud ban notification(1)In generalAn online dating service provider shall provide to a member of the online dating service a fraud ban notification if the member has received a message through the online dating service from a banned member of the online dating service.(2)Required contentsA fraud ban notification under paragraph (1) shall include the following:(A)The username or other profile identifier of the banned member, as well as the most recent time when the member to whom the notification is being provided sent or received a message through the online dating service to or from the banned member.(B)A statement, as applicable, that the banned member identified in subparagraph (A) may have been using a false identity or attempting to defraud members.(C)A statement that a member should not send cash or another form of currency or personal financial information to another member.(D)Information regarding best practices to avoid online fraud or being defrauded by a member of an online dating service, which may be provided through a link to another web page or disclosure.(E)Contact information to reach the customer service department of the online dating service provider.(3)Manner and timing(A)MannerA fraud ban notification under paragraph (1) shall be—(i)clear and conspicuous; and(ii)provided by email, text message, or, if consented to by the member receiving the fraud ban notification, other appropriate means of communication.(B)Timing(i)In generalExcept as provided in clauses (ii) and (iii), an online dating service provider shall provide a fraud ban notification under paragraph (1) not later than 24 hours after the fraud ban is initiated against the banned member.(ii)Delay based on judgment of providerIf, in the judgment of the online dating service provider, the circumstances require a fraud ban notification under paragraph (1) to be provided after the 24-hour period described in clause (i), the online dating service provider shall, except as provided in clause (iii), provide the notification not later than 3 days after the day on which the fraud ban is initiated against the banned member.(iii)Delay upon request of law enforcement officialIf, due to an ongoing investigation, a law enforcement official requests an online dating service provider to delay providing a fraud ban notification under paragraph (1) beyond the time when the notification is required to be provided under clause (i) or (ii), the online dating service provider—(I)may not provide the notification before the end of the period of delay (including any extension of such period) requested by the law enforcement official; and(II)shall provide the notification not later than 3 days after the last day of the period of delay (including any extension of such period) requested by the law enforcement official.(4)Limitation of liabilityAn online dating service provider is not liable to a person in a civil action based on any of the following:(A)The manner of communication used under paragraph (3)(A) to provide a fraud ban notification to a member under paragraph (1).(B)The timing of a fraud ban notification under paragraph (3)(B) provided to a member under paragraph (1).(C)The disclosure of information in a fraud ban notification provided under paragraph (1).(b)Enforcement(1)Enforcement by the Commission(A)Unfair or deceptive acts or practicesA violation of this section or a regulation promulgated under this section shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B) ).(B)Powers of commission(i)In generalThe Commission shall enforce this section in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq. ) were incorporated into and made a part of this section,(ii)Privileges and immunitiesAny person who violates this section shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act.(iii)Authority preservedNothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Commission under any other provision of law.(2)Enforcement by States(A)In generalSubject to subparagraph (B), in any case in which the attorney general of a State has reason to believe that an interest of the residents of the State has been or is threatened or adversely affected by the engagement of any person in an act or practice that violates this section, the attorney general of the State may, as parens patriae, bring a civil action on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate relief.(B)Rights of the Commission(i)Notice to the Commission(I)In generalExcept as provided in subclause (III), before initiating a civil action under subparagraph (A), the attorney general of a State shall notify the Commission in writing that the attorney general intends to bring such civil action.(II)ContentsThe notification required by subclause (I) shall include a copy of the complaint to be filed to initiate the civil action.(III)ExceptionIf it is not feasible for the attorney general of a State to provide the notification required by subclause (I) before initiating a civil action under subparagraph (A), the attorney general shall notify the Commission immediately upon instituting the civil action.(ii)Intervention by the CommissionUpon receiving the notice required by clause (i)(I), the Commission may intervene in the civil action and, upon intervening—(I)be heard on all matters arising in the civil action; and(II)file petitions for appeal of a decision in the civil action.(C)Limitation on State action while Federal action is pendingIf the Commission has instituted a civil action for a violation of this section or a regulation promulgated under this section, no attorney general of a State may bring an action under subparagraph (A) during the pendency of that action against any defendant named in the complaint of the Commission for any violation of this section or a regulation promulgated under this section alleged in the complaint.(D)Rule of constructionFor purposes of bringing a civil action under this subsection, nothing in this subsection may be construed to prevent the attorney general of a State from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general by the laws of the State to conduct investigations, to administer oaths or affirmations, or to compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary or other evidence.(E)Actions by other State officialsIn addition to a civil action brought by an attorney general under subparagraph (A), any other consumer protection officer of a State who is authorized by the State to do so may bring a civil action under subparagraph (A), subject to the same requirements and limitations that apply under this paragraph to a civil action brought by an attorney general.(c)One national standard(1)In generalA State, or political subdivision thereof, may not maintain, enforce, prescribe, or continue in effect any law, rule, regulation, requirement, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of law of the State, or political subdivision of the State, that requires an online dating service provider to notify, prohibits an online dating service provider from notifying, or otherwise affects the manner in which an online dating service provider is required or permitted to notify, a member of the online dating service that the member has received a message from or sent a message to a member whose account or profile on the online dating service is the subject of a fraud ban through the online dating service.(2)Rule of constructionThis subsection may not be construed to preempt any law of a State or political subdivision of a State relating to contracts or torts.(d)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Banned memberThe term banned member means a member of an online dating service whose account or profile on the online dating service is the subject of a fraud ban.(2)CommissionThe term Commission means the Federal Trade Commission.(3)Fraud banThe term fraud ban means the termination or suspension of the account or profile of a member of an online dating service because, in the judgment of the online dating service provider, there is a significant risk the member will attempt to obtain cash or another form of currency from another member through fraudulent means.(4)MemberThe term member means an individual who—(A)submits to an online dating service provider the information required by the provider to establish an account or profile on the online dating service; and(B)is allowed by the provider to establish such an account or profile.(5)Online dating serviceThe term online dating service means a service that—(A)is provided through a website or a mobile application; and(B)offers members access to dating or romantic relationships with other members by arranging or facilitating the social introduction of members.(6)Online dating service providerThe term online dating service provider means a person engaged in the business of offering an online dating service.(7)StateThe term State means each State of the United States, the District of Columbia, each commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, and each federally recognized Indian Tribe.(e)Effective dateThis section shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-03-04
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in Senate Mar 4, 2025
sb841/introduced-in-senate.mdShown Here:
Introduced in Senate (03/04/2025)
Sponsors
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R) sponsors S. 841, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 841 went before 1 committee: Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Reports
1 committee report has been filed on S. 841, the latest S. Rept. 119-58.
- S. Rept. 119-58 — ROMANCE SCAM PREVENTION ACT
Actions
S. 841 has taken 5 actions since Mar 4, 2025, the latest on Sep 2, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 2, 2025 | Senate | Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 119-58.Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee | ||
Sep 2, 2025 | Senate | Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 145. | ||
Mar 12, 2025 | Senate | Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee | ||
Mar 4, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee | ||
Mar 4, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 841 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
S. 841 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- Romance Scam Prevention Act — Display Title
- Romance Scam Prevention Act — Short Title(s) as Reported to Senate
- Romance Scam Prevention Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to require online dating service providers to provide fraud ban notifications to online dating service members, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Cost estimate
The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for S. 841, the latest on Aug 5, 2025.
- S. 841, Romance Scam Prevention Act — 2025-08-05As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation on March 12, 2025
Lobbying
4 clients hired 4 firms and 24 registered lobbyists who named S. 841 in 18 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Science/Technology, Automotive Industry, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Government Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Marine/Maritime/Boating/Fisheries, Medicare/Medicaid.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 7 | — |
| CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | Online dating services | Texas | 1 | 5 | — |
| MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | Online dating services | Texas | 1 | 4 | $150K |
| BUMBLE TRADING LLC | Online application for dating, friendship, or business relationships | Texas | 1 | 2 | $100K |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 1 | 7 | — |
| JGB & ASSOCIATES, LLC | 1 | 5 | — |
| CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | 1 | 4 | $150K |
| AVOQ, LLC | 1 | 2 | $100K |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 24.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLOTTE MCBIRNEY | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| DANIEL HINKLE | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| HEATHER SAGER | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| JULIA DUNCAN | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| LINDA LIPSEN | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| SUSAN STEINMAN | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| VICTOR DIAZ | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| JUSTICE ESTRADA | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| THEODORE NASTASE | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| JOHN BUSCHER | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ELIZABETH FARRAR | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MARC GOLDBERG | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MICHAEL SMITH | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MOLLY CAREY | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| STEPHEN COFFEY | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ELLI SCHANK | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BARRY LASALA | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| BRYCE HARLOW | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CLAIRE FORAN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DANIEL SMITH | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2026 second_quarter | $1.8M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.8M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2026 first_quarter | $1.5M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 first_quarter | $1.4M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 first_quarter | $1.4M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 second_quarter | $1.4M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 third_quarter | $1.4M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| BUMBLE TRADING LLC | AVOQ, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| BUMBLE TRADING LLC | AVOQ, LLC | 2026 first_quarter | $50K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $50K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $50K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | JGB & ASSOCIATES, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | — | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | JGB & ASSOCIATES, LLC | 2026 first_quarter | — | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | JGB & ASSOCIATES, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | — | 4th Quarter - Report |
| CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | JGB & ASSOCIATES, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | — | Registration - Amendm… |
| CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | JGB & ASSOCIATES, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | — | Registration |
| MATCH GROUP HOLDINGS I, LLC | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | — | Registration |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 841 under Commerce, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 5 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 841’s is Commerce.
s841/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
S. 841 carries 5 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Civil actions and liability to Licensing and registrations.
s841/subjects.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com