Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 2235

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 2235, the Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Mar 18, 2025 by Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology, and last saw action on Apr 18, 2025: Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.


Record

Text

H.R. 2235 has 3 co-sponsors.

hb2235/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 2235 IH: Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-03-18
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2235 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 18, 2025 Mr. Vasquez (for himself, Mr. Zinke , and Ms. Leger Fernandez ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture A BILL
To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2025 .
2.
Conservation programs
(a)
Definitions
Section 1240A of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–1 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(11)
Habitat connectivity
The term habitat connectivity means the degree to which landscape or habitat elements facilitate native species movement among seasonal habitats.
(12)
Big game species
The term big game species means native species of large mammals including, wild deer, elk, pronghorn, wild sheep, and moose.
.
(b)
Regional Conservation Partnership Program critical conservation areas
Section 1271F(a)(2)(C) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3871f(a)(2)(C) ) is amended by inserting , including restoration and enhancement of wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, with a focus on big game species before ; and .
(c)
Enrollment in the environmental quality incentives program and the conservation stewardship program of grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program
(1)
Environmental quality incentives program
Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–2(d) ) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (6), by striking A producer and inserting Except as provided in paragraph (8), a producer ; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:
(8)
Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program
(A)
In general
The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is—
(i)
enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and
(ii)
of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii).
(B)
Limitation
A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for practices if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same practice on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1).
.
(2)
Conservation stewardship program
Section 1240J(b) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–22(b) ) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting and except as provided in paragraph (3), after paragraph (2), ; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:
(3)
Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program
(A)
In general
The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is—
(i)
enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and
(ii)
of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii).
(B)
Limitation
A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for conservation activities if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same conservation activities on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1).
(C)
Emergency grazing and haying access preserved
No priority resource concern, practice, or incentive pertaining to restoration and enhancement of wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors on the acres described above will prevent or alter emergency grazing and haying access for grassland acres enrolled in the conservation reserve program.
.
(3)
Payment limitation for rental payments under the conservation reserve program
Section 1234(g)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3834(g)(1) ) is amended by striking $50,000 and inserting $125,000 .
(d)
Increased payments under the environmental quality incentives program
Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–2(d) ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3)(F), by inserting and wildlife habitat connectivity before ; or ; and
(2)
in paragraph (7)(A)—
(A)
in clause (iii), by striking or at the end;
(B)
in clause (iv), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or ; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:
(v)
addresses the conservation and restoration of wildlife habitat, including wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors.
.
(e)
Conservation practice standards
Section 1242 of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3842 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(j)
Addressing barriers to habitat connectivity
(1)
In general
The Secretary shall—
(A)
to the maximum extent practicable, fully incorporate nonstructural methods to control livestock distribution, such as virtual fencing, into the conservation practice standards; and
(B)
provide for the appropriate range of conservation practices and resource mitigation measures available to landowners using nonstructural methods described in subparagraph (A).
(2)
Availability of adequate technical assistance
The Secretary shall ensure that adequate technical assistance is available for the implementation of—
(A)
nonstructural methods described in paragraph (1)(A); and
(B)
other practices that support habitat connectivity (as that term is defined in section 1240A) through Federal conservation programs.
.
(f)
Administrative requirements for conservation programs
Section 1244 of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3844 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(q)
Encouragement of habitat connectivity and big game corridors
In carrying out any conservation program administered by the Secretary, the Secretary may, as appropriate, encourage—
(1)
the conservation of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity, where native big game species (as that term is defined in section 1240A) and ecological processes can transition from one habitat to another, in order to conserve native biodiversity and ensure resiliency against impacts from a range of stressors; and
(2)
the use of conservation practices that support the development, restoration, and maintenance of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity.
.
3.
High-priority research and extension areas
Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 ( 7 U.S.C. 5925(d) ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(21)
Virtual fencing
Research and extension grants may be made under this section for the purposes of—
(A)
understanding and addressing the barriers to the adoption of virtual fencing technology; and
(B)
studying the effects of virtual fencing technology on natural and cultural resources, such as—
(i)
sensitive riparian areas; and
(ii)
crucial winter range and stopover habitats for native big game species (as that term is defined in section 1240A of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–1 )).
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-03-18
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D) sponsors H.R. 2235, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, 2 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 2235 went before 2 committees: Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology Subcommittee and Agriculture.

Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology Subcommittee
Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology Subcommittee
Referred to · Apr 18, 2025 · 57 Bills
Agriculture
Agriculture
Referred To · Mar 18, 2025 · 226 Bills

Actions

H.R. 2235 has taken 3 actions since Mar 18, 2025, the latest on Apr 18, 2025.

ChamberAction
Apr 18, 2025
House
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology Subcommittee
Mar 18, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Mar 18, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.Agriculture Committee

Votes

H.R. 2235 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 2235 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 4 firms and 12 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 2235 in 13 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Natural Resources, Agriculture, Marine/Maritime/Boating/Fisheries, Clean Air and Water (quality), Animals, Transportation, Energy/Nuclear.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPDistrict of Columbia16
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDistrict of Columbia13
BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERSAdvocates for sportsmen and conservation federal policyMontana12
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.District of Columbia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE2026 second_quarter$270K2nd Quarter - Report
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.2026 second_quarter$220K2nd Quarter - Report
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.2026 first_quarter$130K1st Quarter - Report
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE2026 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE2025 fourth_quarter$100K4th Quarter - Report
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP2025 second_quarter$80K2nd Quarter - Report
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP2025 first_quarter$80K1st Quarter - Report
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP2026 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP2026 first_quarter$42K1st Quarter - Report
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP2025 fourth_quarter$30K4th Quarter - Report
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP2025 third_quarter$30K3rd Quarter - Report
BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERSBACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS2025 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERSBACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS2025 first_quarter$10K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 2235 under Agriculture and Food, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 2235’s is Agriculture and Food.

hr2235/policy-areas.txt
Agriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 2235, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 18, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. VASQUEZ:H.R. 2235.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, section 8, Clauses 1 and 18 of the United StateConstitution, to provide for the general welfare and make alllaws necessary and proper to carry out the powers of theCongress.[Page H1173]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com