- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 3312
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 3312, the Quantum Readiness and Innovation Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Dec 2, 2025 by Sen. Gary Peters (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Commerce, Science, And Transportation, and last saw action on Dec 2, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Record
Text
S. 3312 has 1 co-sponsor.
sb3312/introduced-in-senate.txt117 S3312 IS: Quantum Readiness and Innovation Act of 2025U.S. Senate2025-12-02text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 3312 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES December 2, 2025 Mr. Peters (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation A BILLTo require the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop guidance for upgrading information systems to post-quantum cryptography, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Quantum Readiness and Innovation Act of 2025 .2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Appropriate congressional committeesThe term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and(B)the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.(2)Classical computer; quantum computerThe terms classical computer and quantum computer have the meanings given such terms in section 3 of the Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act ( Public Law 117–260 ; 6 U.S.C. 1526 note).(3)Critical infrastructure sectorsThe term critical infrastructure sectors means the critical infrastructure sectors defined in the National Security Memorandum on Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience (NSM–22), dated April 30, 2024.(4)High-impact systemThe term high-impact system means a Federal information system that holds sensitive information, the loss of which would be categorized as high impact under Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 199 (relating to standards for security categorization of Federal information and information systems), as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act.(5)Post-quantum cryptographyThe term post-quantum cryptography —(A)means those cryptographic algorithms or methods that are assessed not to be specifically vulnerable to attack by either a quantum computer or classical computer; and(B)includes—(i)the lattice-based digital signature algorithm specified in National Institute of Standards and Technology Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 204 (dated August 13, 2024; relating to Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard), or any successor standard;(ii)the module-lattice-based key encapsulation mechanism specified in National Institute of Standards and Technology Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 203 (dated August 13, 2024; relating to Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard), or any successor standard; and(iii)any cryptographic algorithm or method implemented in accordance with National Institute of Standards and Technology Federal Information Processing Standard Publication 140–3 (dated March 22, 2019; relating to Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules), or any successor standard, operating within a zero trust architecture as described in National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800–207 (dated August 2020; relating to Zero Trust Architecture), or any successor standard.(6)Sector risk management agencyThe term sector risk management agency has the meaning given such term in section 2200 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( 6 U.S.C. 650 ).3.Guidance on upgrading to post-quantum cryptography(a)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall establish guidance for upgrading information systems to post-quantum cryptography, including guidance that is specifically tailored for critical infrastructure sectors.(b)RequirementThe guidance established pursuant to subsection (a) shall include standards and selection criteria to guide the procurement and deployment of commercial solutions for an entity seeking to upgrade to post-quantum cryptography.(c)Dissemination of guidance(1)In generalThe Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall make available to entities in the private sector the guidance established under subsection (a).(2)Special PublicationsThe Director may satisfy the requirement under paragraph (1) through the publication of Special Publications.(d)Coordination and assistance for industry-Led assessments of adoption ofguidance(1)In generalIf an industry sector representative, who is part of the Quantum Economic Development Consortium, decides to carry out an assessment of the adoption by the industry sector of the guidance established under subsection (a), the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall offer to collaborate on such assessment with such representative.(2)Technical Assistance and Interoperability FrameworksIf requested by the representative described in paragraph (1), the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall support the assessment by providing—(A)technical and administrative support;(B)test beds to support the assessment; and(C)interoperability frameworks.(3)Coordination AssistanceThe Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology may support an assessment described in paragraph (1) by coordinating between stakeholders as the Director considers necessary.4.Strategy for Federal agency upgrade to post-quantum cryptography(a)National Quantum Cybersecurity Upgrade StrategyNot later than 360 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, in coordination with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and in consultation with the Quantum Economic Development Consortium, shall develop a National Quantum Cybersecurity Upgrade Strategy that includes the following:(1)A definition of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer.(2)Recommended standards to apply to determine whether a quantum computer meets such definition, including—(A)the characteristics of such computers; and(B)the particular point at which such computers are capable of attacking real world systems that classical computers are unable to attack.(3)Guidelines for assessing the urgency of upgrading to post-quantum cryptography for each Federal agency relative to—(A)the critical functions of each agency; and(B)the risk each agency faces should a cryptographically relevant quantum computer attack a system operated by the agency.(4)Recommended performance measures for upgrading to post-quantum cryptography for the following tasks:(A)Preparation for upgrading to post-quantum cryptography, including—(i)the adoption of hardware integrating quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms; and(ii)the deployment of software-only post-quantum cryptography overlays that meet or exceed security standards set forth in the Federal Information Processing Standards issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.(B)Establishment of a baseline understanding of the data inventory, including through the use of automated tools to identify assets.(C)Planning and execution of post-quantum cryptographic solutions, including ensuring that data at rest and in motion is subject to appropriate protections.(D)Monitoring and evaluating the success of the upgrade and assessing the security of the system.(5)A plan for implementing the above performance measures, including evaluating and monitoring entities that are at high risk of quantum attacks, including sector risk management agencies.(b)Post-Quantum voluntary pilot program(1)In generalNot later than 360 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall establish a pilot program to provide planning, technical, and any other support the Director considers appropriate to any covered entity that elects to participate in the program for the purpose of upgrading the systems of such covered entity to post-quantum cryptography.(2)High risk entitiesThe Director shall encourage any covered entity that is at high risk of quantum attack to participate in the pilot program established under paragraph (1).(3)RequirementsUnder the pilot program established under paragraph (1)—(A)not later than 18 months after the date of the establishment of the program, not fewer than 1 high-impact system of any covered entity participating in the program shall be upgraded to post-quantum cryptography in accordance with the recommended performance measures described in subsection (a)(4); and(B)upon completion of the initial upgrade under subparagraph (A), the head of the covered entity may upgrade—(i)1 additional system in accordance with such performance measures; or(ii)2 or more systems in accordance with such performance measures if the head notifies the Director before initiating such upgrade.(4)Pilot program reports(A)In generalFor each covered entity participating in the program established under paragraph (1), the Director, in coordination with the head of such entity, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees—(i)an initial report not later than 180 days after the date on which the initial upgrade is completed under paragraph (3)(A); and(ii)an updated report annually until such date as the Director considers appropriate.(B)ElementsEach report submitted under subparagraph (A) shall describe—(i)the actions of the head of the covered entity in carrying out the program; and(ii)any planning, technical, or other support that the Director provided to the head of the covered entity through the program.(5)Covered entity definedIn this subsection, the term covered entity means—(A)a sector risk management agency;(B)a Federal agency; or(C)a mission partner of a Federal agency.(c)Report to CongressNot later than 360 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the National Quantum Cybersecurity Upgrade Strategy developed under subsection (a) and a description of the pilot program established pursuant to subsection (b)(1).
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-12-02
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to require the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop guidance for upgrading information systems to post-quantum cryptography, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Sen. Gary Peters (D) sponsors S. 3312, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 3312 went before 1 committee: Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Actions
S. 3312 has taken 2 actions since Dec 2, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 2, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee | ||
Dec 2, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 3312 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
S. 3312 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Quantum Readiness and Innovation Act of 2025 — Display Title
- Quantum Readiness and Innovation Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to require the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop guidance for upgrading information systems to post-quantum cryptography, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
2 clients hired 3 firms and 8 registered lobbyists who named S. 3312 in 12 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Science/Technology, Budget/Appropriations, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Education, Government Issues, Immigration, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | Nonprofit advocating for artificial intelligence safety and biosecurity | Virginia | 2 | 11 | $300K |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC | 1 | 6 | $180K |
| UPTOWN STRATEGIES INC. (FKA UPTOWN SOLUTIONS LLC) | 1 | 5 | $120K |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| TYLER DEATON | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| GRACEY ROSKAM | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ALYSON SINCAVAGE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| EVAN VIAU | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JENNIFER SANFORD | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KALYN STEPHENS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MARIA PRICE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| WALDO MCMILLAN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | CISCO SYSTEMS, INC | 2025 first_quarter | $840K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $30K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | UPTOWN STRATEGIES INC. (FKA UPTOWN SOLUTIONS LLC) | 2026 second_quarter | $30K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | UPTOWN STRATEGIES INC. (FKA UPTOWN SOLUTIONS LLC) | 2026 first_quarter | $30K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC | 2026 first_quarter | $30K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | $30K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | UPTOWN STRATEGIES INC. (FKA UPTOWN SOLUTIONS LLC) | 2025 fourth_quarter | $30K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 third_quarter | $30K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | UPTOWN STRATEGIES INC. (FKA UPTOWN SOLUTIONS LLC) | 2025 third_quarter | $30K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 second_quarter | $30K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | ALLEGIANCE STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 first_quarter | $30K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | UPTOWN STRATEGIES INC. (FKA UPTOWN SOLUTIONS LLC) | 2025 third_quarter | — | Registration |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 3312 under Science, Technology, Communications, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 3312’s is Science, Technology, Communications.
s3312/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com