Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 2899

Missouri HouseIntroduced

Summary

HB 2899, which modifies provisions governing design-build contracts, was introduced in the House on Jan 12, 2026 by Rep. Anthony Ealy (D). It was referred to Emerging Issues, and last saw action on May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).


Record

Text

HB 2899 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb2899/introduced.txt
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 2899
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE EALY.
6596H.01I JOSEPH ENGLER, Chief Clerk
AN ACT
To repeal section 67.5060, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to
design-build contracts.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Section 67.5060, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu
thereof, to be known as section 67.5060, to read as follows:
67.5060. 1. As used in this section, the following terms mean:
(1) "Design-build", a project delivery method subject to a [three-stage] multistage
qualifications-based selection for which the design and construction services are furnished
under one contract;
(2) "Design-build contract", a contract which is subject to a three-stage qualifications-
based selection process similar to that described in sections 8.285 to 8.291 between a political
subdivision and a design-builder to furnish the architectural, engineering, and related design
services and the labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and other construction services
required for a design-build project;
(3) "Design-build project", the design, construction, alteration, addition, remodeling,
or improvement of any buildings or facilities under contract with a political subdivision.
Such design-build projects include, but are not limited to:
(a) Civil works projects, such as roads, streets, bridges, utilities, airport runways and
taxiways, storm drainage and flood control projects, or transit projects; and
(b) Noncivil works projects, such as buildings, site improvements, and other
structures, habitable or not, commonly designed by architects [in excess of seven million
dollars];
EXPLANATION — Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is
intended to be omitted from the law. Matter in bold-face type in the above bill is proposed language.
HB 2899 2
(4) "Design-builder", any individual, partnership, joint venture, or corporation subject
to a qualification-based selection that offers to provide or provides design services and
general contracting services through a design-build contract or a progressive design-build
contract in which services within the scope of the practice of professional architecture or
engineering are performed respectively by a licensed architect or licensed engineer and in
which services within the scope of general contracting are performed by a general contractor
or other legal entity that furnishes architecture or engineering services and construction
services either directly or through subcontracts or joint ventures;
(5) "Design criteria consultant", a person, corporation, partnership, or other legal
entity duly licensed and authorized to practice architecture or professional engineering in this
state under chapter 327 who is employed by or contracted by the political subdivision to assist
the political subdivision in the development of project design criteria, requests for proposals,
evaluation of proposals, the evaluation of the construction under a design-build contract or a
progressive design-build contract to determine adherence to the design criteria, and any
additional services requested by the political subdivision to represent its interests in relation
to a project. The design criteria consultant may not submit a proposal or furnish design or
construction services for the design-build contract for which its services were sought;
(6) "Design criteria package", performance-oriented program, scope, and
specifications for the design-build project sufficient to permit a design-builder to prepare a
response to a political subdivision's request for proposals for a design-build project or a
progressive design-build project, which may include capacity, durability, standards, ingress
and egress requirements, performance requirements, description of the site, surveys, soil and
environmental information concerning the site, interior space requirements, material quality
standards, design and construction schedules, site development requirements, provisions for
utilities, storm water retention and disposal, parking requirements, applicable governmental
code requirements, preliminary designs for the project or portions thereof, and other criteria
for the intended use of the project;
(7) "Design professional services", services that are:
(a) Within the practice of architecture as defined in section 327.091, or within the
practice of professional engineering as defined in section 327.181; or
(b) Performed by a licensed or authorized architect or professional engineer in
connection with the architect's or professional engineer's employment or practice;
(8) "Progressive design-build contract", a contract that is subject to a two-stage
qualification-based selection process as described in subdivision (1) of subsection 13 of
this section between a political subdivision and a design-builder to furnish the
architectural, engineering, and related design services and the labor, materials, supplies,
HB 2899 3
equipment, and other construction services required for a progressive design-build
project;
(9) "Progressive design-build project", the design, construction, alteration,
addition, remodeling, or improvement of any buildings or facilities under one
progressive design-build contract with a political subdivision. Such progressive
design-build projects include, but are not limited to:
(a) Civil works projects, such as roads, streets, bridges, utilities, airport runways
and taxiways, storm drainage and flood control projects, or transit projects; and
(b) Noncivil works projects, such as buildings, site improvements, and other
structures, habitable or not, commonly designed by architects;
(10) "Proposal", an offer in response to a request for proposals by a design-builder to
enter into a design-build contract for a design-build project or a progressive design-build
contract for a progressive design-build project under this section;
[(9)] (11) "Request for proposal", the document by which the political subdivision
solicits proposals for a design-build contract or a progressive design-build contract;
[(10)] (12) "Stipend", an amount paid to the unsuccessful but responsive, short-listed
design-builders to defray the cost of participating in phase II of the selection process for a
design-build project described in this section.
2. In using a design-build contract or a progressive design-build contract, the
political subdivision shall determine the scope and level of detail required to permit qualified
persons to submit proposals in accordance with the request for proposals given the nature of
the project.
3. A design criteria consultant [shall] may be employed or retained by the political
subdivision to assist in preparation of the design criteria package and request for proposal,
perform periodic site visits to observe adherence to the design criteria, prepare progress
reports, review and approve progress and final pay applications of the design-builder, review
shop drawings and submissions, provide input in disputes, help interpret the construction
documents, perform inspections upon substantial and final completion, assist in warranty
inspections, and provide any other professional service assisting with the project
administration of a design-build project or a progressive design-build project. The
design criteria consultant may also evaluate construction as to the adherence of the design
criteria. The consultant shall be selected and its contract negotiated in compliance with
sections 8.285 to 8.291 unless the consultant is a direct employee of the political subdivision.
4. The political subdivision shall publicly disclose at a regular meeting its intent to
utilize the design-build method or the progressive design-build method and its project
design criteria at least one week prior to publishing the request for proposals. Notice of
requests for proposals shall be advertised by publication in a newspaper of general circulation
HB 2899 4
published in the county where the political subdivision is located once a week for two
consecutive weeks prior to opening the proposals, or by a virtual notice procedure that
notifies interested parties for at least twenty various purchases, design contracts, construction
contracts, or other contracts each year for the political subdivision. The political subdivision
shall publish a notice of a request for proposal with a description of the project, the
procedures for submission, and the selection criteria to be used.
5. The political subdivision shall establish in the request for proposal a time, place,
and other specific instructions for the receipt of proposals. Proposals not submitted in strict
accordance with the instructions shall be subject to rejection.
6. The following provisions of this subsection shall apply to a design-build
project:
(1) A request for proposal shall be prepared for each design-build contract containing
at minimum the following elements:
[(1)] (a) The procedures to be followed for submitting proposals, the criteria for
evaluating proposals and their relative weight, and the procedures for making awards;
[(2)] (b) The proposed terms and conditions for the design-build contract, if available;
[(3)] (c) The design criteria package;
[(4)] (d) A description of the drawings, specifications, or other information to be
submitted with the proposal, with guidance as to the form and level of completeness of the
drawings, specifications, or other information that will be acceptable;
[(5)] (e) A schedule for planned commencement and completion of the design-build
contract, if any;
[(6)] (f) Budget limits for the design-build contract, if any;
[(7)] (g) Requirements including any available ratings for performance bonds,
payment bonds, and insurance, if any;
[(8)] (h) The amount of the stipend which will be available; and
[(9)] (i) Any other information that the political subdivision in its discretion chooses
to supply including, but not limited to, surveys, soil reports, drawings of existing structures,
environmental studies, photographs, references to public records, or affirmative action and
minority business enterprise requirements consistent with state and federal law.
[7.] (2) The political subdivision shall solicit proposals in a three-stage process.
Phase I shall be the solicitation of qualifications of the design-build team. Phase II shall be
the solicitation of a technical proposal including conceptual design for the project. Phase III
shall be the proposal of the construction cost.
[8.] (3) The political subdivision shall review the submissions of the proposals and
assign points to each proposal in accordance with this section and as set out in the instructions
of the request for proposal.
HB 2899 5
[9.] (4) Phase I shall require all design-builders to submit a statement of qualification
that shall include, but not be limited to:
[(1)] (a) Demonstrated ability to perform projects comparable in design, scope, and
complexity;
[(2)] (b) References of owners for whom design-build projects, construction projects,
or design projects have been performed;
[(3)] (c) Qualifications of personnel who will manage the design and construction
aspects of the project; and
[(4)] (d) The names and qualifications of the primary design consultants and the
primary trade contractors with whom the design-builder proposes to subcontract or joint
venture. The design-builder shall not replace an identified contractor, subcontractor, design
consultant, or subconsultant without the written approval of the political subdivision.
[10.] 7. The political subdivision shall evaluate the qualifications of all the design-
builders who submitted proposals in accordance with the instructions of the request for
proposal. Architectural and engineering services on the project shall be evaluated in
accordance with the requirements of sections 8.285 and 8.291. Qualified design-builders
selected by the evaluation team may proceed to phase II of the selection process. Design-
builders lacking the necessary qualifications to perform the work shall be disqualified and
shall not proceed to phase II of the process. This process of short listing shall narrow the
number of qualified design-builders to not more than five nor fewer than two. Under no
circumstances shall price or fees be a part of the prequalification criteria. Design-builders
may be interviewed in either phase I or phase II of the process. Points assigned in phase I of
the evaluation process shall not carry forward to phase II of the process. All qualified design-
builders shall be ranked on points given in phases II and III only.
[11.] 8. The political subdivision shall have discretion to disqualify any design-
builder who, in the political subdivision's opinion, lacks the minimum qualifications required
to perform the work.
[12.] 9. Once a sufficient number of no more than five and no fewer than two
qualified design-builders have been selected, the design-builders shall have a specified
amount of time in which to assemble phase II and phase III proposals.
[13.] 10. Phase II of the process shall be conducted as follows:
(1) The political subdivision shall invite the top qualified design-builders to
participate in phase II of the process;
(2) A design-builder shall submit its design for the project to the level of detail
required in the request for proposal. The design proposal shall demonstrate compliance with
the requirements set out in the request for proposal;
HB 2899 6
(3) The ability of the design-builder to meet the schedule for completing a project as
specified by the political subdivision may be considered as an element of evaluation in phase
II;
(4) Up to twenty percent of the points awarded to each design-builder in phase II may
be based on each design-builder's qualifications and ability to design, contract, and deliver the
project on time and within the budget of the political subdivision;
(5) Under no circumstances shall the design proposal contain any reference to the cost
of the proposal; and
(6) The submitted designs shall be evaluated and assigned points in accordance with
the requirements of the request for proposal. Phase II shall account for not less than forty
percent of the total point score as specified in the request for proposal.
[14.] 11. Phase III shall be conducted as follows:
(1) The phase III proposal shall provide a firm, fixed cost of design and construction.
The proposal shall be accompanied by bid security and any other items, such as statements of
minority participation as required by the request for proposal;
(2) Cost proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the instructions of the
request for proposal. The political subdivision shall reject any proposal that is not submitted
on time. Phase III shall account for not less than forty percent of the total point score as
specified in the request for proposal;
(3) Proposals for phase II and phase III shall be submitted concurrently at the time
and place specified in the request for proposal, but in separate envelopes or other means of
submission. The phase III cost proposals shall be opened only after the phase II design
proposals have been evaluated and assigned points, ranked in order, and posted;
(4) Cost proposals shall be opened and read aloud at the time and place specified in
the request for proposal. At the same time and place, the evaluation team shall make public
its scoring of phase II. Cost proposals shall be evaluated in accordance with the requirements
of the request for proposal. In evaluating the cost proposals, the lowest responsive bidder
shall be awarded the total number of points assigned to be awarded in phase III. For all other
bidders, cost points shall be calculated by reducing the maximum points available in phase III
by at least one percent for each percentage point by which the bidder exceeds the lowest bid
and the points assigned shall be added to the points assigned for phase II for each design-
builder;
(5) If the political subdivision determines that it is not in the best interest of the
political subdivision to proceed with the project pursuant to the proposal offered by the
design-builder with the highest total number of points, the political subdivision shall reject all
proposals. In this event, all qualified and responsive design-builders with lower point totals
shall receive a stipend and the responsive design-builder with the highest total number of
HB 2899 7
points shall receive an amount equal to two times the stipend. If the political subdivision
decides to award the project, the responsive design-builder with the highest number of points
shall be awarded the contract; and
(6) If all proposals are rejected, the political subdivision may solicit new proposals
using different design criteria, budget constraints, or qualifications.
[15.] 12. As an inducement to qualified design-builders, the political subdivision shall
pay a reasonable stipend, the amount of which shall be established in the request for proposal,
to each prequalified design-builder whose proposal is responsive but not accepted. Such
stipend shall be no less than one-half of one percent of the total project budget. Upon
payment of the stipend to any unsuccessful design-builder, the political subdivision shall
acquire a nonexclusive right to use the design submitted by the design-builder, and the
design-builder shall have no further liability for the use of the design by the political
subdivision in any manner. If the design-builder desires to retain all rights and interest in the
design proposed, the design-builder shall forfeit the stipend.
13. The following provisions of this subsection shall apply to a progressive
design-build project:
(1) A request for proposal shall be prepared for each progressive design-build
contract, containing at a minimum the following elements:
(a) The procedures to be followed for submitting proposals, the criteria for
evaluating proposals and their relative weight, and the procedures for making awards;
(b) The proposed terms and conditions for the progressive design-build contract,
if available;
(c) The design criteria package;
(d) A description of the project approach elements, or other information to be
submitted with the proposal, or other information that will be acceptable;
(e) A schedule for planned commencement and completion of the progressive
design-build contract, if any;
(f) Budget limits for the progressive design-build contract, if any;
(g) Requirements including any available ratings for performance bonds,
payment bonds, and insurance, if any; and
(h) Any other information that the political subdivision in its discretion chooses
to supply including, but not limited to, surveys, soil reports, drawings of existing
structures, environmental studies, photographs, references to public records, or
affirmative action and minority business enterprise requirements consistent with state
and federal law.
(2) The political subdivision shall solicit proposals in a two-stage process. Phase
I shall be the solicitation and evaluation of the qualifications of design-builders. Phase
HB 2899 8
II shall be the solicitation and evaluation of proposals describing the design-builder's
approach to design development, preconstruction services, and construction of the
project.
(3) The political subdivision shall review the submissions of the proposals and
assign points to each proposal in accordance with this section and as set out in the
instructions of the request for proposal.
(4) Phase I shall require all design-builders to submit a statement of
qualification that shall include, but not be limited to:
(a) Demonstrated ability to perform projects comparable in design, scope, and
complexity;
(b) References of owners for whom design-build projects or progressive design-
build projects, construction projects, or design projects have been performed;
(c) Qualifications of personnel who will manage the design and construction
aspects of the project; and
(d) The names and qualifications of the primary design consultants and the
primary trade contractors with whom the design-builder proposes to joint venture. The
design-builder shall not replace an identified contractor or design consultant without
the written approval of the political subdivision.
(5) The political subdivision shall evaluate the qualifications of all the design-
builders who submitted proposals in accordance with the instructions of the request for
proposal. Architectural and engineering services on the project shall be evaluated in
accordance with the requirements of sections 8.285 and 8.291. Qualified design-builders
selected by the evaluation team may proceed to phase II of the selection
process. Design-builders lacking the necessary qualifications to perform the work
shall be disqualified and shall not proceed to phase II of the process. This process of
short-listing shall narrow the number of qualified design-builders to not more than five.
Under no circumstances shall price or fees be a part of the prequalification
criteria. Design-builders may be interviewed in either phase I or phase II of the
process. Points assigned in phase I of the evaluation process shall not carry forward to
phase II of the process. All qualified design-builders shall be ranked on points given in
phase II only.
(6) The political subdivision shall have discretion to disqualify any design-
builder who, in the political subdivision's opinion, lacks the minimum qualifications
required to perform the work.
(7) Once a sufficient number of no more than five qualified design-builders have
been selected, the design-builders shall have a specified amount of time in which to
assemble phase II proposals.
HB 2899 9
(8) Phase II of the process shall be conducted as follows:
(a) The political subdivision shall invite the top qualified design-builders to
participate in phase II of the process;
(b) Each invited design-builder shall submit a proposal describing its approach
to design development, collaboration with the political subdivision, and delivery of
preconstruction and construction services. The proposal shall not include any
construction pricing;
(c) The proposal shall demonstrate understanding of the project goals and may
address:
a. Approach to design integration, cost estimating, scheduling, and value
engineering during preconstruction;
b. Approach to subcontractor outreach, selection, and participation;
c. Approach to establishing transparent pricing for the preconstruction and
construction phase; and
d. Any innovations, sustainability measures, or risk-management strategies
proposed for the project;
(d) Evaluation of Phase II proposals shall be qualifications-based. Price
consideration shall be for preconstruction phase services only and may be in the form of
proposed rates, fees, or other acceptable forms as determined by the political
subdivision;
(e) The political subdivision shall rank the Phase II proposals according to the
criteria and weighting established in the request for proposals and may conduct
interviews as part of the evaluation;
(f) Following evaluation, the political subdivision may enter into negotiations
with the highest-ranked design-builder to establish a preconstruction services
agreement. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the political subdivision
may terminate negotiations and commence negotiations with the next highest-ranked
design-builder; and
(g) During the preconstruction phase, the design-builder and the political
subdivision shall collaborate to advance the design to a level sufficient to establish a
fixed contract amount or guaranteed maximum price, consistent with agreed-upon
milestones and deliverables. Upon acceptance of the price and contract terms, the
parties may amend the contract to authorize construction.
[16.] 14. (1) As used in this subsection, "wastewater or water contract" means any
design-build contract that involves the provision of engineering and construction services
either directly by a party to the contract or through subcontractors retained by a party to the
contract for a wastewater or water storage, conveyance, or treatment facility project.
HB 2899 10
(2) Any political subdivision may enter into a wastewater or water contract for
design-build of a wastewater or water project.
(3) In disbursing community development block grants under 42 U.S.C. Sections
5301 to 5321, the department of economic development shall not reject wastewater or water
projects solely for utilizing wastewater or water contracts.
(4) The department of natural resources shall not preclude wastewater or water
contracts from consideration for funding provided by the water and wastewater loan fund
under section 644.122.
(5) A political subdivision planning a wastewater or water design-build project shall
retain an engineer duly licensed in this state to assist in preparing any necessary documents
and specifications and evaluations of design-build proposals.
[17.] 15. The payment bond requirements of section 107.170 shall apply to [the]
design-build [project] projects and progressive design-build projects. All persons
furnishing design services shall be deemed to be covered by the payment bond the same as
any person furnishing labor and materials. The performance bond for the design-builder shall
not cover any damages of the type specified to be covered by the professional liability
insurance established by the political subdivision in the request for proposals.
[18.] 16. Any person or firm performing architectural, engineering, landscape
architecture, or land-surveying services for the design-builder on the design-build project
shall be duly licensed or authorized in this state to provide such services as required by
chapter 327.
[19.] 17. Any political subdivision engaged in a project under this section which
impacts a railroad regulated by the Federal Railroad Administration shall consult with the
affected railroad on required specifications relating to clearance, safety, insurance, and
indemnification to be included in the construction documents for such project.
[20.] 18. Under section 327.465, any design-builder that enters into a design-build
contract with a political subdivision is exempt from the requirement that such person or entity
hold a license or that such corporation hold a certificate of authority if the architectural,
engineering, or land-surveying services to be performed under the design-build contract are
performed through subcontracts or joint ventures with properly licensed or authorized persons
or entities, and not performed by the design-builder or its own employees.
[21.] 19. This section shall not apply to:
(1) Any metropolitan sewer district established under Article VI, Section 30(a) of the
Constitution of Missouri; or
HB 2899 11
(2) Any special charter city, or any city or county governed by home rule under
347 Article VI, Sections 18(a) to 18(r) or 19 of the Constitution of Missouri that has adopted a
348 design-build process via ordinance, rule, or regulation.

Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts

Sponsors

Rep. Anthony Ealy (D) sponsors HB 2899 alone.

Committees

HB 2899 went before 1 committee: Emerging Issues.

Emerging Issues
Emerging Issues
Referred to · May 15, 2026 · 1,249 Bills

History

HB 2899 has taken 3 actions since Jan 12, 2026, the latest on May 15, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 15, 2026
House
Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
Jan 13, 2026
House
Read Second Time (H)
Jan 12, 2026
House
Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Votes

HB 2899 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: house.mo.gov · legiscan.com