Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 8036

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 8036, the Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Mar 24, 2026 by Rep. James Baird (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 22, 2026: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 19.


Record

Text

H.R. 8036 has 2 co-sponsors.

hb8036/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 8036 IH: Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-03-24
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8036 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 24, 2026 Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILL
To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to permit the Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy to submit proposed rules to the Export Administration Review Board, to require the Secretary of State to evaluate the military civil fusion strategy of the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026 .
2.
Interagency rulemaking proposals
Section 1754 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4813 ) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking consultation and inserting coordination ; and
(2)
by adding at the end, the following new subsection:
(g)
Interagency rulemaking proposals
(1)
Submission of proposals
The Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy may submit to the Export Administration Review Board (or its successor) (hereinafter the Board ) a proposal for a new rule, or an amendment to an existing rule, under the Export Administration Regulations.
(2)
Approval of proposals
(A)
In general
Except as provided under subparagraph (B), not later than days 30 days after a proposal is submitted under paragraph (1), the Board shall vote to accept or reject the proposal. The Secretary shall initiate the rulemaking process for each proposal accepted by a simple majority vote of the Board.
(B)
Exception
A Board member may extend the deadline described in subparagraph (A) by an additional 30 days if—
(i)
a Board member requires additional information regarding the proposal with respect to which such extension is sought; and
(ii)
the Board member that issued such proposal agrees to such extension.
.
3.
State Department evaluation of China’s military-civil fusion strategy
(a)
In general
Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, in consultation with each agency that is represented by a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, complete a review of the implications of the military-civil fusion strategy of the People’s Republic of China (in this Act referred to as the PRC ) for the export control policy of the United States and for the national security of the United States, including a review of the following topics:
(1)
The exploitation of United States and allied technology and talent by the PRC to modernize the PRC’s military.
(2)
Whether any entity in the PRC can be considered, in the context of United States national security and export control policy, a purely civilian entity.
(3)
The reliability of end-use checks and end-use conditions for exports, reexports, and in-country transfers to entities that are located or headquartered in, or the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered in, the PRC.
(4)
The relationship between the PRC’s strategic technology sectors (such as artificial intelligence, semiconductor, quantum, robotics, biotechnology) and the PRC’s military.
(5)
Whether the addition of any entity to the Military End-User List would address to any extent the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC.
(6)
Due diligence required by exporters to prevent the PRC’s military from accessing United States technology.
(7)
Whether any change to United States export control policy would address to any extent the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC.
(8)
Any other topic the Secretary determines is relevant for this review.
(b)
Proposed changes to policy
(1)
In general
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall consider proposing to the Export Administration Review Board (or any successor entity) any change to United States export control policy identified pursuant to the review required by subsection (a) , which may include—
(A)
additions to the Military End-User List;
(B)
changes to export control restrictions on certain military end uses;
(C)
new rules or amendments to the Export Administration Regulations;
(D)
a final rule pursuant to the proposed rule published in the Federal Register entitled End-Use and End-User Based Export Controls, Including U.S. Persons Activities Controls: Military and Intelligence End Uses and End Users (89 Fed. Reg. 60985 (July 29, 2024)); and
(E)
any other policy the Secretary determines would address the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC.
(2)
Interagency vote
The Board shall vote on the adoption of each change proposed pursuant to paragraph (1) in the manner described in subsection (g)(2) of section 1754 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4813 ), as added by section 2 .
(c)
Report to Congress
Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following:
(1)
The review required by subsection (a) .
(2)
Any proposed rule required by subsection (b) .
(3)
Any change in United States policy approved by the Export Administration Review Board.
(4)
Any recommended change to United States law that would help address the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC.
4.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees
The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(B)
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.
(2)
Military End-User List
The term Military End-User List means the list maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce and set forth in Supplement No. 7 to part 744 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulations.
(3)
Operating Committee for Export Policy
The term Operating Committee for Export Policy means the Operating Committee for Export Policy referred to in section 1763(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 50 U.S.C. 4822(c) ).
(4)
Secretary
The term Secretary means the Secretary of State.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-03-24
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Mar 24, 2026

hb8036/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (03/24/2026)

Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026

This bill authorizes specified departments to propose regulations on U.S. export controls. It also directs the Department of State to evaluate China's military-civil fusion strategy (a national strategy to eliminate barriers between China's civilian commercial sector and its military and defense industrial sectors).

Specifically, the bill authorizes the State Department and the Departments of Defense and Energy to propose new rules or amendments to existing rules under the Export Administration Regulations. These departments may submit proposals directly to the Export Administration Review Board (EARB), which reviews applications for export licenses. The EARB must vote to accept or reject the proposal within 30 days of the proposal's submission, but the bill allows a 30-day extension.

The Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Securities (BIS) must initiate the rulemaking process for each proposal accepted by a simple majority vote of the EARB.

BIS must also coordinate (instead of consult) with these departments on activities related to U.S. export controls.

The bill also requires the State Department, within 30 days of the bill's enactment, to complete a review of the implications of China's military-civil fusion strategy on U.S. export control policy and national security. The State Department must consider proposing to the EARB (or any successor entity) any change to U.S. export control policy identified pursuant to the review. The EARB must vote on the adoption of each proposal.

The State Department must report to Congress on the activities required by the bill.

Sponsors

Rep. James Baird (R) sponsors H.R. 8036, and 2 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

H.R. 8036 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.

Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Markup By · Apr 22, 2026 · 658 Bills

Actions

H.R. 8036 has taken 4 actions since Mar 24, 2026, the latest on Apr 22, 2026.

ChamberAction
Apr 22, 2026
House
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee
Apr 22, 2026
House
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 19.Foreign Affairs Committee
Mar 24, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Mar 24, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee

Votes

H.R. 8036 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 8036 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to permit the Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy to submit proposed rules to the Export Administration Review Board, to require the Secretary of State to evaluate the military civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 8036, the latest on May 19, 2026.


Lobbying

6 clients hired 6 firms and 33 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8036 in 7 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Trade (domestic/foreign), Budget/Appropriations, Science/Technology, Defense, Education, Computer Industry, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Energy/Nuclear.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.Consumer electronics manufacturerNorth Carolina12
DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INCMaryland11
FDD ACTIONDistrict of Columbia11
SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia11
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia11
SYNOPSYS, INC.electronic design automation (EDA) and intellectual property (IP)California11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 33.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONSIIA2026 second_quarter$1.4M2nd Quarter - Report
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.2026 second_quarter$570K2nd Quarter - Report
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.2026 first_quarter$570K1st Quarter - Report
SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONSEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$460K2nd Quarter - Report
SYNOPSYS, INC.SYNOPSYS, INC.2026 first_quarter$370K1st Quarter - Report
FDD ACTIONFDD ACTION2026 second_quarter$240K2nd Quarter - Report
DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INCDEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC2026 second_quarter$70K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8036 under Foreign Trade and International Finance, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 4 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8036’s is Foreign Trade and International Finance.

hr8036/policy-areas.txt
Foreign Trade and International FinanceAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 8036 carries 4 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Congressional oversight to Trade restrictions.

hr8036/subjects.txt
Congressional oversightGovernment information and archivesLicensing and registrationsTrade restrictions

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8036, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BAIRD:H.R. 8036.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 and Clause 18[Page H2676]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com