- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 8036
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 8036, the Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Mar 24, 2026 by Rep. James Baird (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 22, 2026: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 19.
Record
Text
H.R. 8036 has 2 co-sponsors.
hb8036/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 8036 IH: Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026U.S. House of Representatives2026-03-24text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8036 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 24, 2026 Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILLTo amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to permit the Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy to submit proposed rules to the Export Administration Review Board, to require the Secretary of State to evaluate the military civil fusion strategy of the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026 .2.Interagency rulemaking proposalsSection 1754 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4813 ) is amended—(1)in subsection (a), by striking consultation and inserting coordination ; and(2)by adding at the end, the following new subsection:(g)Interagency rulemaking proposals(1)Submission of proposalsThe Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy may submit to the Export Administration Review Board (or its successor) (hereinafter the Board ) a proposal for a new rule, or an amendment to an existing rule, under the Export Administration Regulations.(2)Approval of proposals(A)In generalExcept as provided under subparagraph (B), not later than days 30 days after a proposal is submitted under paragraph (1), the Board shall vote to accept or reject the proposal. The Secretary shall initiate the rulemaking process for each proposal accepted by a simple majority vote of the Board.(B)ExceptionA Board member may extend the deadline described in subparagraph (A) by an additional 30 days if—(i)a Board member requires additional information regarding the proposal with respect to which such extension is sought; and(ii)the Board member that issued such proposal agrees to such extension..3.State Department evaluation of China’s military-civil fusion strategy(a)In generalNot later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, in consultation with each agency that is represented by a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, complete a review of the implications of the military-civil fusion strategy of the People’s Republic of China (in this Act referred to as the PRC ) for the export control policy of the United States and for the national security of the United States, including a review of the following topics:(1)The exploitation of United States and allied technology and talent by the PRC to modernize the PRC’s military.(2)Whether any entity in the PRC can be considered, in the context of United States national security and export control policy, a purely civilian entity.(3)The reliability of end-use checks and end-use conditions for exports, reexports, and in-country transfers to entities that are located or headquartered in, or the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered in, the PRC.(4)The relationship between the PRC’s strategic technology sectors (such as artificial intelligence, semiconductor, quantum, robotics, biotechnology) and the PRC’s military.(5)Whether the addition of any entity to the Military End-User List would address to any extent the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC.(6)Due diligence required by exporters to prevent the PRC’s military from accessing United States technology.(7)Whether any change to United States export control policy would address to any extent the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC.(8)Any other topic the Secretary determines is relevant for this review.(b)Proposed changes to policy(1)In generalNot later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall consider proposing to the Export Administration Review Board (or any successor entity) any change to United States export control policy identified pursuant to the review required by subsection (a) , which may include—(A)additions to the Military End-User List;(B)changes to export control restrictions on certain military end uses;(C)new rules or amendments to the Export Administration Regulations;(D)a final rule pursuant to the proposed rule published in the Federal Register entitled End-Use and End-User Based Export Controls, Including U.S. Persons Activities Controls: Military and Intelligence End Uses and End Users (89 Fed. Reg. 60985 (July 29, 2024)); and(E)any other policy the Secretary determines would address the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC.(2)Interagency voteThe Board shall vote on the adoption of each change proposed pursuant to paragraph (1) in the manner described in subsection (g)(2) of section 1754 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4813 ), as added by section 2 .(c)Report to CongressNot later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following:(1)The review required by subsection (a) .(2)Any proposed rule required by subsection (b) .(3)Any change in United States policy approved by the Export Administration Review Board.(4)Any recommended change to United States law that would help address the national security risks posed by the military-civil fusion strategy of the PRC.4.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Appropriate congressional committeesThe term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and(B)the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.(2)Military End-User ListThe term Military End-User List means the list maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce and set forth in Supplement No. 7 to part 744 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulations.(3)Operating Committee for Export PolicyThe term Operating Committee for Export Policy means the Operating Committee for Export Policy referred to in section 1763(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 ( 50 U.S.C. 4822(c) ).(4)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of State.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-03-24
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Mar 24, 2026
hb8036/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (03/24/2026)
Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026
This bill authorizes specified departments to propose regulations on U.S. export controls. It also directs the Department of State to evaluate China's military-civil fusion strategy (a national strategy to eliminate barriers between China's civilian commercial sector and its military and defense industrial sectors).
Specifically, the bill authorizes the State Department and the Departments of Defense and Energy to propose new rules or amendments to existing rules under the Export Administration Regulations. These departments may submit proposals directly to the Export Administration Review Board (EARB), which reviews applications for export licenses. The EARB must vote to accept or reject the proposal within 30 days of the proposal's submission, but the bill allows a 30-day extension.
The Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Securities (BIS) must initiate the rulemaking process for each proposal accepted by a simple majority vote of the EARB.
BIS must also coordinate (instead of consult) with these departments on activities related to U.S. export controls.
The bill also requires the State Department, within 30 days of the bill's enactment, to complete a review of the implications of China's military-civil fusion strategy on U.S. export control policy and national security. The State Department must consider proposing to the EARB (or any successor entity) any change to U.S. export control policy identified pursuant to the review. The EARB must vote on the adoption of each proposal.
The State Department must report to Congress on the activities required by the bill.
Sponsors
Rep. James Baird (R) sponsors H.R. 8036, and 2 members have co-sponsored it.
Committees
H.R. 8036 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.
Actions
H.R. 8036 has taken 4 actions since Mar 24, 2026, the latest on Apr 22, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee | ||
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 19.Foreign Affairs Committee | ||
Mar 24, 2026 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Mar 24, 2026 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee |
Votes
H.R. 8036 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 8036 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026 — Display Title
- Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to permit the Secretary of State, Defense, or Energy to submit proposed rules to the Export Administration Review Board, to require the Secretary of State to evaluate the military civil fusion strategy of the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Cost estimate
The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 8036, the latest on May 19, 2026.
- H.R. 8036, Interagency Coordination in Export Controls Act of 2026 — 2026-05-19As ordered reported by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on April 22, 2026
Lobbying
6 clients hired 6 firms and 33 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8036 in 7 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Trade (domestic/foreign), Budget/Appropriations, Science/Technology, Defense, Education, Computer Industry, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Energy/Nuclear.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | Consumer electronics manufacturer | North Carolina | 1 | 2 | — |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | — | Maryland | 1 | 1 | — |
| FDD ACTION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | electronic design automation (EDA) and intellectual property (IP) | California | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 1 | 2 | — |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 1 | 1 | — |
| FDD ACTION | 1 | 1 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 | — |
| SIIA | 1 | 1 | — |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 33.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDREW GINSBURG | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| HEATHER SMITH | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JON BEAMER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JOSEPH DONOGHUE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| LESLEY HILL | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| YELENA VAYNBERG | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ALEXANDRIA PAOLOZZI MOORE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ANDREW GINSBERG | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ANDREW ROLLO | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ANTON VAN SEVENTER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| BETHANY ABBATE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| COLIN MCGLYNN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CONNOR PFEIFFER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DANIEL VAYNSHTEYN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DANNY BOUNDS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DAVID ISAACS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DUSTIN TODD | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| HAJAR HAMMADO | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JAMES REDSTONE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MATTHEW REID ZWEIG | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SIIA | 2026 second_quarter | $1.4M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $570K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $570K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 2026 second_quarter | $460K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | SYNOPSYS, INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $370K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| FDD ACTION | FDD ACTION | 2026 second_quarter | $240K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 2026 second_quarter | $70K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8036 under Foreign Trade and International Finance, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 4 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8036’s is Foreign Trade and International Finance.
hr8036/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 8036 carries 4 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Congressional oversight to Trade restrictions.
hr8036/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8036, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BAIRD:H.R. 8036.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 and Clause 18[Page H2676]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com