Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 8037

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 8037, the Protect American AI Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Mar 24, 2026 by Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R). It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 24, 2026: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 8037 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb8037/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 8037 IH: Protect American AI Act of 2026
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-03-24
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8037 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 24, 2026 Mr. Baumgartner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To limit the effect of litigation on the environmental application process for data centers and associated infrastructure.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Protect American AI Act of 2026 .
2.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Covered application
The term covered application means an application for an authorization to site, construct, expand, or operate a—
(A)
data center; or
(B)
covered infrastructure.
(2)
Data center
The term data center means any facility that primarily contains electronic equipment used to process, store, or transmit digital information.
(3)
Covered infrastructure
The term covered infrastructure means any infrastructure, facility, or other project that is primarily constructed, expanded, or operated to support a data center.
3.
Effect of litigation on data center and covered infrastructure applications
(a)
Effect of litigation
A civil action relating to an environmental review under the Natural Gas Act ( 15 U.S.C. 717 et seq. ), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ), sections 10 and 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 ( 33 U.S.C. 403 ; 408), the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ), or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ) with respect to a data center or covered infrastructure shall not affect the validity of a permit, license, or approval issued for the data center or covered infrastructure that is the subject of the civil action.
(b)
Remand; processing of covered applications
If, in a civil action described in subsection (a), the environmental review for a permit, license, or approval issued to the data center or covered infrastructure that is the subject of the civil action is found by the applicable court to violate the Natural Gas Act ( 15 U.S.C. 717 et seq. ), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ), sections 10 and 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 ( 33 U.S.C. 403 ; 408), the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ), or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. )—
(1)
notwithstanding chapter 5 or 7 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Administrative Procedure Act ), the applicable court shall not set aside or vacate the permit, license, or approval issued for the data center or covered infrastructure but instead remand the matter to the relevant Federal agency to resolve the violation; and
(2)
the relevant Federal agency shall continue to process all covered applications.
4.
Action on covered applications
(a)
Judicial review
Except for review in the Supreme Court of the United States, the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which a data center or covered infrastructure is, or will be, located pursuant to a covered application shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action for the review of an order issued by a Federal agency with respect to the covered application.
(b)
Expedited review
The applicable United States Court of Appeals under subsection (a) shall—
(1)
set any civil action brought under this subsection for expedited review; and
(2)
set the action on the docket as soon as practicable after the filing date of the initial pleading.
(c)
Transfer of existing actions
In the case of a covered application for which a petition for review has been filed as of the date of enactment of this Act, the petition shall be—
(1)
on a motion by the applicant, transferred to the court of appeals of the United States in which the data center or covered infrastructure that is the subject of the covered application is, or will be, located; and
(2)
adjudicated in accordance with this section.
(d)
Limitation on claims
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a claim arising under Federal law seeking judicial review of a permit, license, or approval issued by a Federal agency for a data center or covered infrastructure pursuant to a covered application shall be barred unless the claim is filed not later than 90 days after publication of a notice in the Federal Register announcing that the permit, license, or approval is final pursuant to the law under which the agency action is taken, unless a shorter time is specified in the Federal law pursuant to which judicial review is allowed.
(e)
Savings clause
Nothing in this section establishes a right to judicial review or places any limit on filing a claim that a person has violated the terms of a permit, license, or approval.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-03-24
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To limit the effect of litigation on the environmental application process for data centers and associated infrastructure.

Sponsors

Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R) sponsors H.R. 8037 alone.

Committees

H.R. 8037 went before 2 committees: Energy and Commerce and Judiciary.

Energy and Commerce
Energy and Commerce
Referred To · Mar 24, 2026 · 1,636 Bills
Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Mar 24, 2026 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 8037 has taken 2 actions since Mar 24, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 24, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Mar 24, 2026
House
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 8037 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 8037 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Protect American AI Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • Protect American AI Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To limit the effect of litigation on the environmental application process for data centers and associated infrastructure. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

6 clients hired 6 firms and 38 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8037 in 12 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Energy/Nuclear, Natural Resources, Budget/Appropriations, Government Issues, Agriculture, Animals, Clean Air and Water (quality), Chemicals/Chemical Industry.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
EARTHJUSTICE ACTIONnonprofit advocacy organizationDistrict of Columbia13
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDistrict of Columbia12
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.Consumer electronics manufacturerNorth Carolina12
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESDistrict of Columbia12
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERVirginia12
EARTHJUSTICEDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 38.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.2026 second_quarter$570K2nd Quarter - Report
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.2026 first_quarter$570K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2026 second_quarter$540K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2026 first_quarter$506.4K1st Quarter - Report
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER2026 first_quarter$280K1st Quarter - Report
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE2026 second_quarter$270K2nd Quarter - Report
EARTHJUSTICE ACTIONEARTHJUSTICE ACTION2026 second_quarter$188.3K2nd Quarter - Amendme…
EARTHJUSTICE ACTIONEARTHJUSTICE ACTION2026 second_quarter$188.3K2nd Quarter - Report
EARTHJUSTICE ACTIONEARTHJUSTICE ACTION2026 first_quarter$111.7K1st Quarter - Report
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFEDEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE2026 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER2026 second_quarter$90K2nd Quarter - Report
EARTHJUSTICEEARTHJUSTICE2026 first_quarter$55.5K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8037 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8037’s is Law.

hr8037/policy-areas.txt
LawAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8037, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BAUMGARTNER:H.R. 8037.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Art I, Sec 8[Page H2676]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com