Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 1025

Louisiana HouseIn House Committee

Summary

HB 1025, which provides relative to a violation of a protective order, was introduced in the House on Mar 30, 2026 by Rep. Beryl Amedee (R). It was referred to Administration of Criminal Justice, and last saw action on Mar 31, 2026: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.


Record

Text

HB 1025 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb1025/introduced.txt
HLS 26RS-2056 ORIGINAL
2026 Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 1025
BY REPRESENTATIVE AMEDEE
DOMESTIC ABUSE: Provides relative to a violation of a protective order
AN ACT
To enact R.S. 14:79(I), relative to protective orders; to provide for an affirmative defense;
to provide for exceptions to violations of protective orders; and to provide for related
matters.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
Section 1. R.S. 14:79(I) is hereby enacted to read as follows:
§79. Violation of protective orders
* * *
I.(1) If a preliminary or permanent injunction or protective order was issued
pursuant to R.S. 9:361 et seq., R.S. 9:372, R.S. 46:2131 et seq., R.S. 46:2151, R.S.
46:2171 et seq., R.S. 46:2181 et seq., or Code of Civil Procedure Article 3604 or
3607.1, by a family court or other court having civil jurisdiction over a divorce
proceeding or other civil proceeding, it shall be an affirmative defense to prosecution
pursuant to this Section if all of the following occur:
(a) The person protected by the protective order knowingly and voluntarily
initiated contact with the defendant for the purpose of reconciliation of a marriage
or restoration of the relationship.
(b) The defendant did not initiate the contact in violation of the protective
order.
Page 1 of 2
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.
HLS 26RS-2056 ORIGINAL
HB NO. 1025
(c) The contact occurred with the express request, invitation, or consent of
the person protected by the protective order.
(2) The affirmative defense provided in this Section does not apply if the
defendant used force, threats, coercion, or intimidation to obtain the protected
person's consent or participation.
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
HB 1025 Original 2026 Regular Session Amedee
Abstract: Provides an affirmative defense for violation of a protective order.
Present law provides for violations of protective orders.
Proposed law provides that a defendant has an affirmative defense for violating a protective
order if the following occurs:
(1) The person protected by the protective order voluntarily initiated contact with the
defendant.
(2) The defendant did not initiate contact with the protected person.
(3) The contact occurred with the consent of the protected person.
Proposed law does not apply if the defendant used force, threats, or coercion to obtain the
consent of the protected person.
(Adds R.S. 14:79(I))
Page 2 of 2
CODING: Words in struck through type are deletions from existing law; words underscored
are additions.

Provides relative to a violation of a protective order

Sponsors

Rep. Beryl Amedee (R) sponsors HB 1025 alone.

Committees

HB 1025 went before 1 committee: Administration of Criminal Justice.

Administration of Criminal Justice
Administration of Criminal Justice
Referred to · Mar 31, 2026 · 53 Bills

History

HB 1025 has taken 2 actions since Mar 30, 2026, the latest on Mar 31, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 31, 2026
House
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
Mar 30, 2026
House
Read by title. Lies over under the rules.

Votes

HB 1025 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: legis.la.gov · legiscan.com