Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 8780

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 8780, the Critical Mineral and Extraction Tax Parity Act, was introduced in the House on May 13, 2026 by Rep. Blake Moore (R) with 16 co-sponsors. It was referred to Ways And Means, and last saw action on May 13, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.


Record

Text

H.R. 8780 has 16 co-sponsors.

hb8780/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 8780 IH: Critical Mineral and Extraction Tax Parity Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-05-13
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8780 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 13, 2026 Mr. Moore of Utah (for himself, Mr. Buchanan , Mr. Carey , Mr. Miller of Ohio , and Mr. Bean of Florida ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand and improve the advanced manufacturing production tax credit.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Critical Mineral and Extraction Tax Parity Act .
2.
Expansion and improvement of advance manufacturing production tax credit
(a)
Inclusion of additional critical minerals
(1)
In general
Section 45X(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (AA), by inserting after clause (xxv) the following new clauses:
(xxvi)
Boron.
(xxvii)
Copper.
(xxviii)
Lead.
(xxix)
Metallurgical coal.
(xxx)
Potash.
(xxxi)
Rhenium.
(xxxii)
Silicon.
(xxxiii)
Silver.
(xxxiv)
Uranium.
, and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
(BB)
Phosphate
Phosphate which is—
(i)
converted to—
(I)
phosphoric acid, or
(II)
phosphorus with a minimum purity of 99 percent phosphorus by mass, or
(ii)
phosphate rock purified to a minimum purity of 20 percent phosphorus pentoxide by mass suitable for use in the production of phosphoric acid.
.
(2)
Effective date
The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to minerals produced and sold after December 31, 2025.
(b)
Inclusion of ore extraction costs in advanced manufacturing production credit
(1)
In general
Section 45X(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—
(A)
by redesignating the paragraph (4) relating to restrictions relating to prohibited foreign entities as paragraph (5), and
(B)
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(6)
Extraction costs for critical minerals
(A)
In general
In the case of a taxpayer that extracts ore that is subsequently refined into an applicable critical mineral, costs incurred by the taxpayer with respect to such extraction shall be treated as costs described in subsection (b)(1)(M) for purposes of this section if such taxpayer submits to the Secretary a certification from the refiner of such ore that—
(i)
such ore has been refined into an applicable critical mineral, and
(ii)
such refiner sold the applicable critical mineral to an unrelated person (as defined in subsection (a)(3)) and such sale occurred in a trade or business of the refiner.
(B)
Certain foreign ore not eligible
The cost of extracting ore shall be taken into account under subparagraph (A) only if—
(i)
such ore was extracted in the United States, or
(ii)
in the case of ore extracted outside of the United States—
(I)
the ore is of a type not extracted in the United States in commercial quantities, and
(II)
the ore was not extracted in a foreign country of concern (as defined in section 10612(a)(1) of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act ( 42 U.S.C. 19221(a)(1) )).
(C)
Regulations preventing double benefit
The Secretary shall issue such regulations or guidance as may be necessary or appropriate to ensure that no costs which are treated as costs described in subsection (b)(1)(M) by reason of subparagraph (A) are included, directly or indirectly, in the costs of production of any applicable critical mineral by any taxpayer except as provided by such subparagraph.
.
(2)
Effective date
The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2025.
(c)
Repeal of reduction in credit amount for metallurgical coal
(1)
In general
Section 45X(b)(1)(M) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking (2.5 percent in the case of metallurgical coal) .
(2)
Effective date
The amendment made by this subsection shall apply to minerals produced and sold after December 31, 2025.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-05-13
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand and improve the advanced manufacturing production tax credit.

Sponsors

Rep. Blake Moore (R) sponsors H.R. 8780, and 16 members have co-sponsored it, 4 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 8780 went before 1 committee: Ways and Means.

Ways and Means
Ways and Means
Referred To · May 13, 2026 · 1,160 Bills

Actions

H.R. 8780 has taken 2 actions since May 13, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 13, 2026
House
Introduced in House
May 13, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.Ways and Means Committee

Votes

H.R. 8780 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 8780.

Titles

H.R. 8780 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Critical Mineral and Extraction Tax Parity Act — Display Title
  • To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand and improve the advanced manufacturing production tax credit. — Official Title as Introduced
  • Critical Mineral and Extraction Tax Parity Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced

Lobbying

12 clients hired 9 firms and 123 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8780 in 12 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Budget/Appropriations, Energy/Nuclear, Trade (domestic/foreign), Defense, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Environment/Superfund, Homeland Security.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.Semiconductor equipment manufacturerCalifornia11$60K
BAYER CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MONSANTO COMPANY)Agriculture and Healthcare.District of Columbia11$50K
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGYHolding company for various energy related businesses.Iowa11$40K
BATTERY COUNCIL INTERNATIONALManufacturers, recyclers, distributors, and retailers of batteriesIllinois11$20K
MOSAIC COMPANYCrop nutrition.Florida11$20K
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.District of Columbia11
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.District of Columbia11
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCILDistrict of Columbia11
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia11
SEMIDistrict of Columbia11
THE MOSAIC COMPANYFlorida11
U.S. TRAVEL ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 123.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.2026 second_quarter$17M2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$820K2nd Quarter - Report
U.S. TRAVEL ASSOCIATIONU.S. TRAVEL ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$800K2nd Quarter - Report
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCILINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL2026 second_quarter$720K2nd Quarter - Report
THE MOSAIC COMPANYTHE MOSAIC COMPANY2026 second_quarter$510K2nd Quarter - Report
SEMISEMI2026 second_quarter$470K2nd Quarter - Report
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.2026 second_quarter$260K2nd Quarter - Report
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.THE WASHINGTON TAX & PUBLIC POLICY GROUP2026 second_quarter$60K2nd Quarter - Report
BAYER CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MONSANTO COMPANY)THE WASHINGTON TAX & PUBLIC POLICY GROUP2026 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGYTHE WASHINGTON TAX & PUBLIC POLICY GROUP2026 second_quarter$40K2nd Quarter - Report
MOSAIC COMPANYTHE WASHINGTON TAX & PUBLIC POLICY GROUP2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
BATTERY COUNCIL INTERNATIONALBRUMIDI GROUP2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8780 under Taxation, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8780’s is Taxation.

hr8780/policy-areas.txt
TaxationAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8780, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 81 (Wednesday, May 13, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. MOORE of Utah:H.R. 8780.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8[Page H3453]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com