Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 8992

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 8992, the SCCOTUS Act, was introduced in the House on May 21, 2026 by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D). It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on May 21, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 8992 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb8992/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 8992 IH: Supreme Court Certiorari Oversight and Transparency Standards Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-05-21
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8992 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 21, 2026 Mr. Raskin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To establish a panel to review certiorari petitions, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Supreme Court Certiorari Oversight and Transparency Standards Act or the SCCOTUS Act .
2.
Certification panel
(a)
In general
Chapter 81 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1254 the following:
1255.
Supreme Court certification panel
(a)
Establishment
There is established a body to be known as the Supreme Court Certification Panel (hereinafter the Panel ).
(b)
Composition
The Panel shall consist of 13 circuit judges of the United States courts of appeals.
(c)
Random Selection and Rotation
(1)
Term designations
At the beginning of each term of the Supreme Court, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall, using the random selection process established under subsection (g)(11)(B), designate 1 circuit judge from each United States court of appeals, who shall serve on the Panel for that term.
(2)
Designation process
Each circuit judge designated under this section shall be—
(A)
an active judge who has served in Federal judicial office not less than 5 years; or
(B)
a senior or retired judge who is listed on the roster maintained under section 294.
(3)
Consecutive service
No judge may serve on the Panel for more than 1 consecutive term.
(4)
Assignment
The Panel shall be assigned all petitions for writs of certiorari for review.
(d)
Presiding Judge
The most senior judge shall serve as Presiding Judge of the Panel for that term.
(e)
Support Staff
The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall provide administrative and clerical support to the Panel.
(f)
Vacancy
If a member of the panel dies, retires, or is unable to serve the remainder of the member’s term, within 90 days of the occurrence of the vacancy, the vacancy shall be filled by a circuit judge in accordance with subsection (c)(2). The circuit judge so designated shall serve for the remainder of the term of the former member.
(g)
Jurisdiction and duties of panel
(1)
Primary function
The Panel shall review all petitions for writs of certiorari filed with the Supreme Court and grant or deny such petitions.
(2)
Reviewing a petition for a writ of certiorari
(A)
In general
A decision to grant a petition for a writ of certiorari shall require the concurrence of 4 members of the Panel.
(B)
Written statement
Each decision to grant a petition for a writ of certiorari shall include a written statement briefly explaining the reason for granting such request and identifying the questions presented for review.
(C)
Consolidation
The Panel may consolidate petitions for writs of certiorari presenting substantially identical questions of law and certify them jointly.
(3)
Denials
When a petition for a writ of certiorari is denied, the Panel shall enter an order of denial stating that none of the criteria in paragraph (5) were sufficiently met and no further explanation is required.
(4)
Stays pending appeal
A member of the Panel shall have the same authority to grant a stay as a Justice of the Supreme Court has under Supreme Court Rule 23 (or any successor rule).
(5)
Criteria for certification
The Panel may grant a petition for a writ of certiorari only if one or more of the following criteria are met:
(A)
Considerations governing review
A petition for a writ of certiorari may be granted only for compelling reasons, including—
(i)
a United States court of appeals has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of another United States court of appeals on the same important matter;
(ii)
has decided an important Federal question in a way that conflicts with a decision by a State court of last resort, or has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by an inferior court, as to call for an exercise of supervisory power of the Supreme Court;
(iii)
a State court of last resort has decided an important Federal question in a way that conflicts with the decision of another State court of last resort or of a United States court of appeals;
(iv)
a State court or a United States court of appeals has decided an important question of Federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by the Supreme Court, or has decided an important Federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court.
(B)
Granting a petition before judgment
A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, may only be granted upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination by the Supreme Court.
(6)
Limitation
The Panel may not reexamine factual findings or weigh the sufficiency of evidence in the record.
(7)
Operating procedures
(A)
Meetings
The Panel shall sit as a motions court, meeting at least once monthly during the term, and may conduct business electronically when necessary.
(B)
Quorum
Six judges shall constitute a quorum.
(C)
Public reporting
(i)
In general
At the close of each term, the Panel shall issue a public report, published on the website of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and submitted to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate summarizing—
(I)
the number of petitions reviewed;
(II)
the number of petitions granted and denied; and
(III)
general statistical data on grounds for granting such petitions.
(ii)
Limitation
No report issued pursuant to clause (i) may disclose confidential deliberations or identifying information about pending cases.
(8)
Transmission to the Supreme Court
Each petition for a writ of certiorari that is granted shall be transmitted to the Clerk of the Supreme Court to be entered on the docket.
(9)
Review by the Supreme Court
A petition for a writ of certiorari granted by the Panel shall be deemed granted by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court shall set the case for oral argument pursuant to Supreme Court Rules.
(10)
Ethics and disqualification
(A)
Ethics
Panel judges shall be subject to the Code of Conduct for United States Judges and standards for recusal.
(B)
Disqualification
A judge who participated in a case in an inferior court shall be disqualified from any consideration of a petition for writ of certiorari with respect to that case.
(11)
Implementation
(A)
Rules
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall promulgate rules governing the administration and operation of the Panel consistent with this section.
(B)
Record keeping
The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall establish the random-selection mechanism and maintain public records of the selection process.
(h)
Definitions
In this section, the term term means the term commencing on the first Monday in October of each year and such other adjourned or special term as the Supreme Court may hold.
.
(b)
Clerical amendment
The table of sections for chapter 81 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1255 of title 28, United States Code, the following:
1254A. Supreme Court certification panel.
.
3.
Severability
If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such a provision or amendment to any particular person or circumstance is held invalid, the remaining provisions of this Act and the amendments made by this Act, and the application of such remaining provisions and amendments to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-05-21
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To establish a panel to review certiorari petitions, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D) sponsors H.R. 8992 alone.

Committees

H.R. 8992 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · May 21, 2026 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 8992 has taken 2 actions since May 21, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 21, 2026
House
Introduced in House
May 21, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 8992 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 8992 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • SCCOTUS Act — Display Title
  • SCCOTUS Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Supreme Court Certiorari Oversight and Transparency Standards Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To establish a panel to review certiorari petitions, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 2 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8992 in 1 quarterly filing, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Government Issues.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAYDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
MARGE BAKER111
PAUL GORDON111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAYPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY2026 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8992 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8992’s is Law.

hr8992/policy-areas.txt
LawAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8992, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 87 (Thursday, May 21, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. RASKIN:H.R. 8992.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8[Page H3726]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com