Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 8991

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 8991, the SHADOW Act, was introduced in the House on May 21, 2026 by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D). It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on May 21, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 8991 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hr8991/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 8991 IH: Supreme Court Honesty and Disclosure of Orders and Writs Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-05-21
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8991 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 21, 2026 Mr. Raskin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To amend section 2101 of title 28, United States Code, to set forth factors for stays pending appeal.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Supreme Court Honesty and Disclosure of Orders and Writs Act or the SHADOW Act .
2.
Requirement to set forth factors for stays pending appeal
Section 2101(f) of title 28, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
by striking In any case and inserting (1) In any case ; and
(2)
by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
(2)
In determining whether to grant or deny a stay under this subsection the Supreme Court or a justice thereof shall—
(A)
require a showing of specific, concrete, and irreparable injury that is distinct from and greater than any harm resulting solely from the operation of the stay that is being challenged;
(B)
ensure that the determination under this section does not entail findings or conclusions on the ultimate merits of the case or the likelihood of a particular party prevailing; and
(C)
provide that any such stay shall not be accorded precedential effect except to the extent necessary to resolve the dispute between the parties in which the stay was entered.
(3)
(A)
The Supreme Court or justice shall set forth on the record the basis for an issuance or denial of a stay under this section, including—
(i)
whether, absent such relief, the applicant will suffer an injury described in paragraph (2)(A);
(ii)
whether issuance of such relief will substantially injure any other party interested in the proceeding; and
(iii)
whether the determination to issue or deny such stay was in the public interest.
(B)
The basis under subparagraph (A) shall be published on the public docket of the Supreme Court at the time of the issuance or denial of such stay.
(C)
The requirement under subparagraph (B) shall not apply if the Supreme Court or a justice thereof determines that immediate action is necessary to prevent imminent or irreparable harm. If there is such a need, the basis under subparagraph (A) shall be published on the public docket of the Supreme Court not later than 7 days after the issuance or denial of such stay.
(4)
For purposes of this subsection, a stay includes any order of the Supreme Court or a justice thereof granting or denying relief to suspend, modify, or preserve the effect of a lower court’s order granting or denying injunctive relief.
.
3.
Conforming amendment to the all writs act
Section 1651 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(c)
(1)
The Supreme Court or a justice thereof may only issue a writ enjoining any party from the conduct specified in the writ, if the Court or a justice thereof determines that enjoining such conduct is necessary as a result of a critical and exigent circumstance to protect an indisputably clear legal right that is at issue in the case.
(2)
(A)
The Supreme Court or a justice thereof shall set forth on the record the reasons for the determination made under paragraph (1) including identifying, if applicable, the legal right at issue in the case and why it is indisputably clear, the motion for a writ.
(B)
The reasons under subparagraph (A) shall be published on the public docket of the Supreme Court at the time at which the motion for the writ is granted or denied.
(C)
The requirement under subparagraph (B) shall not apply if the Supreme Court or a justice thereof determines that immediate action is necessary to prevent imminent or irreparable harm. If there is such a need, the basis under subparagraph (A) shall be published on the public docket of the Supreme Court not later than 7 days after the writ is granted or denied.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-05-21
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend section 2101 of title 28, United States Code, to set forth factors for stays pending appeal.

Sponsors

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D) sponsors H.R. 8991 alone.

Committees

H.R. 8991 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · May 21, 2026 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 8991 has taken 2 actions since May 21, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 21, 2026
House
Introduced in House
May 21, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 8991 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 8991 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • SHADOW Act — Display Title
  • SHADOW Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Supreme Court Honesty and Disclosure of Orders and Writs Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend section 2101 of title 28, United States Code, to set forth factors for stays pending appeal. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 2 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8991 in 1 quarterly filing, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Government Issues.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAYDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
MARGE BAKER111
PAUL GORDON111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAYPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY2026 second_quarter$50K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8991 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8991’s is Law.

hr8991/policy-areas.txt
LawAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8991, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 87 (Thursday, May 21, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. RASKIN:H.R. 8991.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8[Page H3726]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com