Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 9922

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 9922, the AI Transparency in Elections Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Jul 23, 2026 by Rep. Joseph Morelle (D) with 5 co-sponsors. It was referred to Administration, and last saw action on Jul 23, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.


Record

Text

H.R. 9922 has 5 co-sponsors.

hb9922/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 9922 IH: AI Transparency in Elections Act of 2026
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-07-23
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9922 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 23, 2026 Mr. Morelle (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington , Ms. Sewell , Mrs. Torres of California , and Ms. Johnson of Texas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration A BILL
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide further transparency for the use of content that is substantially generated by artificial intelligence in political advertisements by requiring such advertisements to include a statement within the contents of the advertisements if generative AI was used to generate any image, audio, or video footage in the advertisements, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the AI Transparency in Elections Act of 2026 .
2.
Requiring disclaimers on advertisements containing content substantially generated by artificial intelligence
(a)
Requirement
Section 318 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 ( 52 U.S.C. 30120 ) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(e)
Special disclaimer for covered communications containing content substantially generated by artificial intelligence
(1)
Definitions
For purposes of this subsection:
(A)
Covered communication
(i)
In general
The term covered communication means a communication through any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, outdoor advertising facility, mailing, telephone bank, internet or other digital medium, or any other type of general public political advertising that—
(I)
expressly advocates for or against the nomination or election of a candidate;
(II)
refers to a candidate at any time during the period beginning 120 days before the date of a primary election or nominating caucus or convention and ending on the date on which a general election occurs; or
(III)
solicits a contribution for a candidate or political committee or any other person who makes disbursements for communications described in subclause (I) or (II).
(ii)
Voice and likeness
A communication that invokes the likeness or voice of a candidate shall be treated as a communication that refers to such candidate.
(B)
Generative artificial intelligence
The term generative artificial intelligence means artificial intelligence technology that uses machine learning (including deep-learning models, natural language processing, or other computational processing techniques of similar or greater complexity) to generate text, images, audio, video, or other media.
(C)
Substantially generated by artificial intelligence
(i)
In general
The term substantially generated by artificial intelligence means an image, audio, or video that was created or materially altered using generative artificial intelligence.
(ii)
Exception
Such term does not include an image, audio, or video that—
(I)
has only minor alterations by generative artificial intelligence (including cosmetic adjustments, color editing, cropping, resizing, and other immaterial uses); and
(II)
does not create a fundamentally different understanding than a reasonable person would have from an unaltered version of the media.
(2)
Requirement
When a person makes a disbursement for the purpose of financing a covered communication containing an image, audio, or video that was substantially generated by artificial intelligence, the covered communication shall include, in a clear and conspicuous manner, a statement that the covered communication contains such an image, audio, or video.
(3)
Safe harbor for determining clear and conspicuous manner
A statement required under this subsection shall be considered to be made in a clear and conspicuous manner if the statement meets the following requirements:
(A)
Image covered communications
In the case of an image that is a covered communication, the statement—
(i)
appears in letters at least as large as the majority of the text in the covered communication or otherwise meets the requirements under subsection (c)(1);
(ii)
meets the requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c);
(iii)
states that the covered communication was created or materially altered by artificial intelligence; and
(iv)
is permanently affixed to the covered communication.
(B)
Audio covered communications
In the case of an audio covered communication, the statement—
(i)
is spoken in a clearly audible and intelligible manner at the beginning or end of the covered communication and lasts not fewer than 4 seconds; and
(ii)
includes the following audio statement in a clearly spoken manner: ___________ used artificial intelligence to generate the contents of this communication. (with the blank filled in with the name of person who made the disbursement to pay for such covered communication).
(C)
Video covered communications
In the case of a video covered communication that also includes audio, the statement is made both in—
(i)
a written format that meets the requirements of subparagraph (A) and appears throughout the length of the video covered communication; and
(ii)
an audible format that meets the requirements of subparagraph (B).
.
(b)
Enforcement
(1)
In general
Section 309(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 ( 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C) )(i)) is amended—
(A)
in the matter before subclause (I), by inserting or a qualified disclaimer requirement after a qualified disclosure requirement ; and
(B)
in subclause (II)—
(i)
by striking a civil money penalty in an amount determined, for violations of each qualified disclosure requirement and inserting
a civil money penalty—
(aa)
for violations of each qualified disclosure requirement, in an amount determined
;
(ii)
by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and
(iii)
by adding at the end the following new item:
(bb)
for violations of each qualified disclaimer requirement, in an amount which is determined under a schedule of penalties which is established and published by the Commission and which takes into account the existence of previous violations by the person and how broadly the communication is distributed and such other factors as the Commission considers appropriate, provided that any such civil penalty shall not exceed $50,000 per covered communication.
.
(2)
Failure to respond
Section 309(a)(4)(C)(ii) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C)(ii) ) is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting , except that in the case of a violation of a qualified disclaimer requirement, failure to timely respond after the Commission has notified the person of an alleged violation under subsection (a)(1) shall constitute the person’s admission of the factual allegations of the complaint. .
(3)
Qualified disclaimer requirement defined
Section 309(a)(4)(C) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C) ) is amended by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi) and by inserting after clause (iv) the following new clause:
(v)
In this subparagraph, the term qualified disclaimer requirement means the requirement of section 318(e)(2).
.
(4)
Application
Clause (vi) of section 309(a)(4)(C) of such Act ( 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C) ), as redesignated by paragraph (3), is amended—
(A)
by striking shall apply with respect to violations and inserting
shall apply—
(I)
with respect to violations of qualified disclosure requirements
;
(B)
by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following new subclause:
(II)
with respect to violations of qualified disclaimer requirements occurring on or after the date of the enactment of the AI Transparency in Elections Act of 2026 .
.
(5)
Time of judicial review
Section 309(a)(8)(A) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 ( 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(8)(A) ) is amended by inserting (45-day period in the case of any complaint alleging a violation of section 318(e)(2)) after 120-day period .
(c)
Regulations
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Election Commission shall, in consultation with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, promulgate a regulation to carry out the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b), including—
(1)
criteria for determining whether a covered communication (as defined in section 318(e) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as added by subsection (a)) contains an image, audio, or video substantially generated by artificial intelligence (as defined in such section); and
(2)
requirements for the contents of the statement required under section 318(e)(2) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as added by subsection (a).
(d)
Effective date
The amendments made by this section shall—
(1)
apply with respect to any communication made after the date of the enactment of this Act; and
(2)
take effect without regard to whether the Federal Election Commission has promulgated regulations to carry out such amendments.
3.
Reports
Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, and biannually thereafter, the Federal Election Commission shall submit a report to the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate and the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives that includes—
(1)
an assessment of the compliance with and the enforcement of the requirements of subsection (e) of section 318 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as added by this Act; and
(2)
recommendations for any modifications to that subsection to assist in carrying out the purposes of that subsection.
4.
Severability
If any provision of this Act or any amendment made by this Act, or the application of any such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, and the application of such provision or amendment to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected by the holding.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-07-23
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide further transparency for the use of content that is substantially generated by artificial intelligence in political advertisements by requiring such advertisements to include a statement within the contents of the advertisements if generative AI was used to generate any image, audio, or video footage in the advertisements, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Joseph Morelle (D) sponsors H.R. 9922, and 5 members have co-sponsored it, 4 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 9922 went before 1 committee: Committee on House Administration.

Committee on House Administration
Committee on House Administration
Referred To · Jul 23, 2026 · 196 Bills

Actions

H.R. 9922 has taken 2 actions since Jul 23, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jul 23, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Jul 23, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.Committee on House Administration

Votes

H.R. 9922 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 9922, as Cross-Congress related bill.

Titles

H.R. 9922 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • AI Transparency in Elections Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • AI Transparency in Elections Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide further transparency for the use of content that is substantially generated by artificial intelligence in political advertisements by requiring such advertisements to include a statement within the contents of the advertisements if generative AI was used to generate any image, audio, or video footage in the advertisements, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 9922 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 9922’s is Government Operations and Politics.

hr9922/policy-areas.txt
Government Operations and PoliticsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 9922, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 121 (Thursday, July 23, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. MORELLE:H.R. 9922.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:This bill is enacted pursuant to the power granted toCongress under Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1 and Article I,Section 8, Clause 18 of the United States Constitution.[Page H5198]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com