- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means
yellowhammernews.com · Sawyer Knowles · September 7, 2026

Steve Marshall helps sink New York's $75 billion climate 'penalty' on coal, oil and gas producers - Yellowhammer News
# Steve Marshall helps sink New York’s $75 billion climate ‘penalty’ on coal, oil and gas producers
Sawyer Knowles
September 7, 2026
(CSPAN/Screenshot, YHN)
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall is touting a federal court victory blocking New York’s $75 billion climate law, which sought to make major fossil fuel producers pay for costs attributed to climate change.
Marshall joined a multistate coalition challenging New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act, enacted in 2024 under Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul.
The law would have required certain oil, coal and natural gas companies tied to greenhouse gas emissions to contribute a combined $75 billion over 25 years toward infrastructure and other projects intended to address climate-related damage.
Chief U.S. District Judge Brenda Sannes of the Northern District of New York ruled Monday that the state could not enforce the law.
Sannes found that the measure was preempted by the federal Clean Air Act and federal authority over foreign affairs, concluding that New York had attempted to regulate in areas where federal interests predominate.
Marshall praised the decision Friday, arguing the law threatened energy producers operating legally under existing federal regulations.
“This ruling puts a stop to New York’s attempt to penalize two decades of lawful energy production,” Marshall said.
He said the coalition challenged the law in part to protect energy workers and consumers in states such as Alabama from policies enacted elsewhere.
New York’s law applied to emissions associated with fossil fuels produced between 2000 and 2024, with financial responsibility assigned to companies based on their estimated share of emissions.
Supporters argued the policy would shift the costs of climate-related infrastructure damage away from taxpayers and onto major fossil fuel producers. Hochul’s administration has said it is reviewing its options following the ruling.
The decision could reach beyond New York. Vermont has enacted a similar climate Superfund law that is facing its own legal challenge, while lawmakers in several other states have considered comparable measures.
Marshall’s office said the Alabama-led coalition is also challenging Vermont’s law, making Monday’s ruling an important test of how far states can go in imposing climate-related costs on fossil fuel producers.
Sawyer Knowles is a state and political reporter for Yellowhammer News. You may contact him at sawyer@yellowhammernews.com.
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|