- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means
alphanews.org · Anthony Gockowski · September 7, 2026

House GOP leader: 'Democrats' attack on religious colleges' will cost taxpayers $3.3 million | Alpha News MN
# House GOP leader: ‘Democrats’ attack on religious colleges’ will cost taxpayers $3.3 million
A judge ordered the state to pay $3.3 million in attorneys' fees and expenses to the plaintiffs who successfully challenged Minnesota's ban on certain religious colleges from participating in the PSEO program.
By
Anthony Gockowski
September 7, 2026
Left: Rep. Harry Niska/Minnesota House; Right: Crown College/Facebook
Minnesota taxpayers will be on the hook for $3.3 million in attorneys’ fees after the state unsuccessfully sought to ban certain religious institutions from participating in the state’s Post-Secondary Enrollment Options (PSEO) program.
The longstanding PSEO program allows high school students to earn college credits for free. The law in question was passed in 2023 by the DFL-controlled legislature and prohibited religious colleges from requiring on-campus PSEO students to sign a faith statement attesting to the institution’s beliefs and values.
It also forbade schools from basing “any part of the admission decision on a student’s race, creed, ethnicity, disability, gender, or sexual orientation or religious beliefs or affiliations.”
The law was immediately challenged in court by Crown College and the University of Northwestern-St. Paul, along with concerned parents, who were represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.
“In the last six years, the Supreme Court has three times held that once a state opens funding to private institutions, the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause forbids excluding participants based on their religion or their religious use of the funds,” they said in their lawsuit.
U.S. District Judge Nancy Brasel agreed with the plaintiffs and struck down the law “in its entirety as facially unconstitutional” in August 2025.
In a July 28 order this year, Brasel ordered the state to pay $3.3 million in attorneys’ fees and expenses to the plaintiffs, writing that “the volume of hours Becket expended reflects the demands of sophisticated and successful constitutional litigation against a well‐resourced government defendant.”
The defendants in the case, the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) and Commissioner Willie Jett, were represented by Attorney General Keith Ellison’s Office.
“Prevailing counsel who achieved complete relief—as Plaintiffs did here—are entitled to a ‘fully compensatory fee,’” Brasel wrote.
“Nor can MDE ‘litigate tenaciously and then be heard to complain about the time necessarily spent by the plaintiff in response,’” she continued. “MDE asserted counterclaims and sought expanded discovery; Plaintiffs urged the Court to decide the case on summary judgment without expanded discovery.”
House Republican Floor Leader Harry Niska, R-Ramsey, noted that his caucus “warned Democrats in 2023 that targeting colleges because of their religious beliefs was blatantly unconstitutional and would be struck down by the courts, but Democrats refused to listen.”
“The plaintiffs had to sue to protect their U.S. Constitutional rights, and then they had to endure a long legal process to defend themselves after the Walz administration and Attorney General Ellison counter-sued them. This was clearly done to punish these two colleges for merely exercising their religious freedoms,” said Niska.
“Attorney General Ellison countersuing and continuing to defend a law he should have known was unconstitutional is inexcusable,” he continued. “Now taxpayers are stuck with a $3.3 million bill for Democrats’ attack on religious freedom. This entire mess was entirely predictable, completely avoidable, and an indefensible waste of taxpayer dollars.”
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|