- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means
Nebraska Examiner · Juan Salinas II · September 4, 2026
U.S. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., left, and Democrat Chris Backemeyer will face off for Nebraska's 1st Congressional District in November 2026. (Candidate photos courtesy of respective campaigns | U.S. Capitol photo by Ashley Murray/States Newsroom) LINCOLN — Debates for Nebraska’s 1st Congressional District are up in the air after public spats from the candidates.
Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Flood and Democratic challenger Chris Backemeyer pointed fingers at each other after each declined particular dates to debate. Flood’s camp wanted to hold a debate before early voting ballots are mailed out later this month, while Backemeyer offered different dates in October due to scheduling conflicts.
Flood’s campaign released a statement late Thursday afternoon, saying that Backemeyer had turned down multiple date suggestions for the Nebraska Public Media debate.
“Nebraskans deserve an opportunity to hear from both candidates before voting begins. Chris Backemeyer told Nebraska media he wants to debate, but back-track Backemeyer turned down multiple dates when it came time to schedule it,” Brentin Ungar, Flood’s campaign manager, said in the statement.
Hours later, Backemeyer released his own statement, saying Flood had declined the League of Women Voters’ invitation to its debate earlier this week, though the invitations had been sent out in July. The League of Women Voters, in an Aug. 31 newsletter, also said Flood had declined their debate.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
SUBSCRIBE
Flood’s press release focused only on the debate hosted by Nebraska Public Media. The Flood Campaign declined the League of Women Voters debate because of the group’s “political ideology.”
Backemeyer said if Flood “is so busy that he can’t talk to Nebraskans in the entire month of October, he should just come out and say it.”
The former diplomat said the offer to debate on any day in October still stands. He added that Flood is running away from his record as he “doesn’t want to stand on a stage and defend a war with no strategy, a bill he admits he didn’t read, and tariffs crushing our farmers.”
Nebraska Public Media spokesperson told the Omaha World-Herald the three outlets planning the debate “ continue to talk with the candidates to identify a date that works for everyone.”
NPM, the World-Herald, and KRVN radio are involved in organizing the debate.
The 1st District comprises 12 counties, including Lancaster County, which is home to heavily Democratic Lincoln, whose blue voters often are outvoted by the region’s more conservative smaller cities and rural areas.
Flood has won his past two U.S. House elections by 20 and 16 percentage points, respectively. Analysts, including the nonpartisan Center for Politics, the Cook Political Report and Inside Elections, consider the 1st District seat safely Republican — though national Democrats see the race as competitive .
In addition to Flood and Backemeyer, the America First Party has a candidate in the race, Dan Hartong. Libertarian Nik Sandman is also running.
The general election is Nov. 3.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
SUPPORT
5:58 pm The story has been updated to included more context of the League of Women Voters debate.
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|