- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means
Podcast: Pros and cons on a ballot question to raise the bar for changing the state constitution
One of four ballot questions voters will consider on Nov. 3 would make it harder for state constitutional amendments to pass. South Dakota lawmakers can place amendments on the ballot, and so can citizens if they collect enough signatures from registered South Dakota voters. Amendments currently need a simple majority from voters to pass, but […]
South Dakota Searchlight · Meghan O'Brien · September 4, 2026
State Rep. John Hughes, R-Sioux Falls, left, sponsored a resolution to add a question to the ballot which, if successful, will raise the bar for changing the state constitution. Dakota Rural Action's Chase Jensen, right, opposes the ballot question. (Hughes photo by Makenzie Huber/South Dakota Searchlight; Jensen photo courtesy of Dakota Rural Action) Searchlight Report is a podcast from South Dakota Searchlight. Reporter and host Meghan O’Brien works with other Searchlight journalists to take listeners inside politics and policy in The Mount Rushmore State.
One of four ballot questions voters will consider on Nov. 3 would make it harder for state constitutional amendments to pass.
South Dakota lawmakers can place amendments on the ballot, and so can citizens if they collect enough signatures from registered South Dakota voters. Amendments currently need a simple majority from voters to pass, but Amendment L would change that. If it passes — ironically with a simple majority — future amendments would need 60% support from voters for approval.
Election 2026
News and commentary on statewide races and ballot questions.
Read the latest>
Supporters of the measure, including state Rep. John Hughes, R-Sioux Falls, say voters have been putting too much policy in the constitution, which should be reserved for the structure and functions of government. He sponsored the legislative resolution that sent Amendment L to the ballot.
Opponents, including Dakota Rural Action ’s Chase Jensen, say Republican lawmakers want to prevent voters from passing amendments — like one requiring Medicaid expansion, which passed four years ago — that the lawmakers don’t like.
A “yes” vote on Amendment L will require all future amendments to receive 60% support from voters to be added to the state constitution. A “no” vote would keep the threshold at a simple majority.
Click here to access a transcript for this episode.
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|